An Open Thread Without Polling Data?!?

Filed in Open Thread by on March 9, 2012

I know, I know, most of you are right now writhing on the floor going through withdrawal without the daily dose of polling goodness that usually accompanies our Open Thread. Let me explain what happened. As I was uploading some thumbnail pictures and editing some posts this morning, our server hosting company for some reason thought I was a hacker, and they blocked my IP address. Yes, I was banned from my own blog. The irony. At the time, I thought the whole site went down and we were suffering a server outage. It took most of the morning to track down what happened, and as a result I was not able to post the open thread. But I thank MJ for stepping up, and I thank our IT geek, LiberalGeek, for dealing with my hysterical demands.

But now lets feed our addiction:

REPUBLICAN PRIMARY — PRESIDENT

NATIONAL (Gallup Tracking): Romney 37, Santorum 23, Gingrich 12, Paul 11
NATIONAL (Rasmussen): Romney 39, Santorum 27, Gingrich 17, Paul 10
ALABAMA (Rasmussen): Gingrich 30, Santorum 29, Romney 28 and Paul 7.
ALABAMA (Capital Survey Research/AEA): Romney 31, Santorum 22, Gingrich 21, Paul 7
MISSISSIPPI (American Research Group): Gingrich 35, Romney 31, Santorum 20, Paul 7.
MISSISSIPPI (Rasmussen): Romney 35, Santorum 27, Gingrich 27 and Paul 6.
CALIFORNIA (PPIC): Romney 28, Santorum 22, Gingrich 17, Paul 8

My thoughts: So we have Santorum leading in an Alabama today from yesterday, and now Gingrich leading in another today and Romney leading in yet another today. All three are bunched at the top. If Romney wins, then his campaign is right, the Republican primary is over. If Gingrich loses, his campaign is over. If Santorum wins, that means he is the remaining Non-Romney and this thing gets interesting.

Same rules apply in Mississippi. We have Gingrich leading in one poll and Romney in another, with all three within striking distance. If Gingrich loses, his campaign is over. If Romney wins, the primary is over. If Santorum wins, it gets interesting.

GENERAL ELECTION — PRESIDENT

NATIONAL (Rasmussen Tracking): Obama d. Romney (48-44); Obama d. Santorum (50-42)
CALIFORNIA (PPIC): Obama d. “Generic Republican” (53-37)
MAINE (PPP): Obama d. Paul (54-38); Obama d. Romney (58-35); Obama d. Santorum (58-35); Obama d. Gingrich (60-32)
BATTLEGROUND STATES (Rasmussen): Obama d. Romney (46-42)

The Battleground states above are Florida, Virginia, North Carolina and Ohio. But Rasmussen doesn’t break down the numbers to each state, so these numbers while nice, are worthless. For all I know, Obama is blowing out Romney in Virginia and North Carolina and losing by a small margin in Florida and Ohio, and that averages out to Obama 46-42.

About the Author ()

Comments (10)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. MJ says:

    Ah, but I just threw some stuff together. You are the Open Thread guru. And how about those Wisconsin Badgers?

  2. AQC says:

    Chris Christie’s “brand” of calling people idiots is getting old, especially when it’s a war veteran.

  3. Digby says:

    Does anyone happen to know how many innocent people have now been killed by Obama’s unmanned drone attacks? I have been looking for an accurate number but I keep finding big large disparities in the projections I’ve found. It appears the number is somewhere between a couple hundred and a thousand, but I don’t know for sure. Does anyone know where that information can be found?

  4. Que Pasa says:

    This just in…

    R’Money 48% to 43% for the fatherless Critical Race-baiter.
    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll

    LOL!

  5. Jason330 says:

    In all honesty, I do hope that the Rassy results are comforting to you. Lord knows, you’ll need some comforting over the next 8 months.

  6. Que Pasa says:

    Hmmm…kind of looks like a graph that depicts the downward mood of the electorate as it relates to the upward price of gas and goods and services.

  7. Jason330 says:

    So, basically reading graphs isn’t one of your strong suits.

  8. Que Pasa says:

    From a trend-line prespective, my observation looks about right.

  9. Geezer says:

    “kind of looks like a graph that depicts the downward mood of the electorate as it relates to the upward price of gas and goods and services.”

    Always fun to see conservatives hating on America. That’s such a winning formula.