Rommey is not hating women enough for the National Review

Filed in National by on August 23, 2012

According the National Review, if Rommey would only follow fake science, and be an even bigger a-hole, everyone would fall in line and vote for the alpha male. [Prepare yourself for level 5 GOP style misogyny]

What do women want? The conventional biological wisdom is that men select mates for fertility, while women select for status — thus the commonness of younger women’s pairing with well-established older men but the rarity of the converse. The Demi Moore–Ashton Kutcher model is an exception — the only 40-year-old woman Jack Nicholson has ever seen naked is Kathy Bates in that horrific hot-tub scene. Age is cruel to women, and subordination is cruel to men. Ellen Kullman is a very pretty woman, but at 56 years of age she probably would not turn a lot of heads in a college bar, and the fact that she is the chairman and CEO of Dupont isn’t going to change that.

It’s a good thing Mitt Romney doesn’t hang out in college bars.

You want off-the-charts status? Check out the curriculum vitae of one Willard M. Romney: $200 million in the bank (and a hell of a lot more if he didn’t give so much away), apex alpha executive, CEO, chairman of the board, governor, bishop, boss of everything he’s ever touched. Son of the same, father of more. It is a curious scientific fact (explained in evolutionary biology by the Trivers-Willard hypothesis — Willard, notice) that high-status animals tend to have more male offspring than female offspring, which holds true across many species, from red deer to mink to Homo sap. The offspring of rich families are statistically biased in favor of sons — the children of the general population are 51 percent male and 49 percent female, but the children of the Forbes billionaire list are 60 percent male. Have a gander at that Romney family picture: five sons, zero daughters. Romney has 18 grandchildren, and they exceed a 2:1 ratio of grandsons to granddaughters (13:5). When they go to church at their summer-vacation home, the Romney clan makes up a third of the congregation. He is basically a tribal chieftain.

Professor Obama? Two daughters. May as well give the guy a cardigan. And fallopian tubes.

From an evolutionary point of view, Mitt Romney should get 100 percent of the female vote. All of it.

Read on if you dare….

Bonus question: How do Republican women get through the day hanging around a-ho;es like this? Protective secretions I suppose.

About the Author ()

Jason330 is a deep cover double agent working for the GOP. Don't tell anybody.

Comments (13)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. cassandra_m says:

    I thought that linking to the National Review here was a banning offence. Or is this the one where you buy your fellow editors dinner at Deep Blue?

  2. reis says:

    As a father of two daughters, according to the National Review I’m a complete putz. However, the bright spot seems to be that I can dominate and leave my ‘scent’ on any males with more than two daughters. I wonder if my natural secretions have anything to do with this.

  3. SussexAnon says:

    Do you think anyone at NRO knows that W Bush has two daugthers?

  4. puck says:

    By renouncing Akin, RYANromney is violating the Republican rule of repeating a lie until it becomes generally accepted. Get your head back in the game, PAULmitt! It’s the secretions, dammit!

    … and did anybody notice how Akin told Ryan to f**k off, when Ryan suggested he withdraw? And Ryan slunk away with his tail between his legs.

  5. socialistic ben says:

    The first lady looks much happier when she looks at her husband that Anne Romney does when she looks at hers. Romney also comes off as the Boss of his family, Obama looks like a father. Im kinda surprised that this “writer” didnt go after Obama for having a successful strong woman as his partner, where as Mitt has a brood mare…. no dressage joke intended…

  6. reis says:

    What about Lyndon Johnson? I remember the late, great Phyllis Diller making fun of his two daughters, for the sole reason that they both closely physically resembled their father.

  7. socialistic ben says:

    MItt Romney has never publicly denied drowning his daughters in a ritualistic sacrifice to Aqua Buddha.

  8. SussexAnon says:

    And what about the super rich like Rush Limbaugh? No kids and on his 3rd or 4th marriage?

    Either he’s not trying hard enough, is practicing contraception or is “the gay.”

  9. Aoine says:

    Ok – so HE may have 200million in the bank
    But why then do these well heeled married women to rich white Republicans have young lovers?

    I mean don’t you all remember “the Graduate?”. Or the ‘mrs Robinson ” types

    The rich white married woman and the cabana/pool/yard boy had been a joke for 100’s of years

    And the republicans still want to say its about the money- negating the fact that while they r in the boardroom. So someone else has taken their place in the bedroom

  10. reis says:

    Aoine, the politically correct phrase is “Cougar”.

  11. Aoine says:

    Oh I know plenty of cougars- not all of them have money tho. lol.

  12. auntie dem says:

    Simply disgusting.

  13. heragain says:

    From an evolutionary biology POV, this is wrong, because Mitt’s sons are not, in fact, able to reproduce themselves. Several of his grandchildren wouldn’t even exist if Ryan had his way. Ryan, just to be clear, is said to be a practicing Catholic, married since 2000, yet has only 3 children. From an evolutionary standpoint, he’s only one over bare replacement.