Tuesday Open Thread [10.9.12]
Mitt Romney gave a foreign policy speech yesterday in which he criticized the President and then announced he had no ideas different than the President.
Here are the horrific reviews of the speech:
Washington Post: “Much of Romney’s address focused on the complex threat posed by Iran, but he did not propose specific solutions that differ from the Obama administration’s current policy of tightening sanctions and insisting that an Iranian nuclear bomb is intolerable.”
New York Times: “Mr. Romney has yet to fill in many of the details of how he would conduct policy toward the rest of the world, or to resolve deep ideological rifts within the Republican Party and his own foreign policy team.”
New York Magazine: “Romney’s speech is still light on details, and those around him wonder if he’s even reading the various policy papers produced by the warring factions on his foreign policy team.”
Politico: “The former Massachusetts governor also criticized Obama for ending the war in Iraq, one of the president’s proudest accomplishments.”
AP: “The Republican has given several foreign policy speeches throughout the campaign, including one in Reno, Nev., ahead of a weeklong trip abroad in the summer. That trip was fraught, with Romney offending his British hosts by questioning their security preparations for the Olympic Games and raising hackles among Palestinians who charged him with racism after he said culture was part of the reason Israelis were more economically successful than the neighboring Palestinians.”
Washington Post: “Romney’s description of Russia as America’s ‘number one geopolitical foe’ has drawn criticism, and his overseas trip in July, intended to showcase Romney as a world leader and potential commander in chief, was widely seen as plagued by missteps.”
Los Angeles Times: “Romney faced his own political troubles after putting out a statement in the middle of the night while the attack on the U.S. consulate was still unfolding… His campaign has often struggled to explain what Romney would do differently than his Democratic rival in international hotspots such as Syria, Libya, Afghanistan and Iran.”
NBC’s First Read: “But according to the excerpts of the speech, almost every policy Romney will call for — tough sanctions on Iran, withdrawal from Afghanistan by 2014, a two-state solution between the Israelis and Palestinians, free trade, vigorously going after the terrorists in Libya — has been pursued by the Obama administration.”
michaelscherer @michaelscherer Romney: “Obama has not signed one new free trade agreement” Here is the photo of Obama signing 3: http://tinyurl.com/8m93d9l Not new enough?
Daniel Gross @grossdm You see, last year, Obama signed new free trade agreements with South Korea, Panama, and Colombia. Surely Romney knows that.
Sam Youngman @samyoungman WHY? Why does he repeat that potus has “signed” no new FTAs? Why oh why? I mean, why?
Lisa Desjardins @LisaDCNN ROMNEY NO SPECIFICS: on Iran sanctions he’d add, how he’d learn which Syrian rebels share US values & how he’d restart Is/Pal peace talks
Josh Marshall @joshtpm Surprisingly large part of Romney speech made up of defiantly announcing initiatives that Obama is already doing #RomneyStrength
e mcmorris-santoro @evanmc_s Albright says Romney’s foreign policy speech had “Cold War tone,” and “nostalgia for that period”
Byron Tau @ByronTau Prof. Madeleine Albright on Romney’s op-ed in the WSJ: “If one of my students turned it in, they’d get a C.”
Daniel Larison @DanielLarison So Romney largely ignored everyone who recommended that he say something new, substantive, or interesting
Tim Dickinson @7im combined with his proposed Pentagon buildup, Romney’s calling for a NATO-wide spike in defense spending of ~$3 Trillion over a decade #wowza
A sampling of today’s headlines:
Washington Post: CNN’s O’Brien bludgeons Romney adviser with Israel-policy ‘contradiction’
New York Times: Romney Strives to Stand Apart in Global Policy
MSNBC: Learning foreign policy ‘at the International House of Pancakes’
The Hill: Campaigns spar over funds for embassy security in Ryan budget
New York Magazine: Advisers Admit They Don’t Know Where Romney Stands on Foreign Policy
Huffington Post: Romney Foreign Policy Speech To Soften Stance On Israel-Palestine Peace Process
Los Angeles Times: Obama campaign calls Romney ‘unmitigated disaster’ on world stage
Associated Press: Spain quip adds to Romney’s foreign policy trouble
Think Progress: Four Key Areas Where Romney’s ‘New’ Foreign Policy Is Identical To Obama
The Atlantic: Romney Strains to Find Big Differences with Obama on Foreign Policy
Politico: : Albright: Romney would get a C on foreign policy
I just added that video. The guy makes a pretty compelling case… THROUGH SONG!
You have to listen to the whole thing to get the full impact.
And they say that there aren’t any good conservative comedians.
Speaking of train wrecks… How’s Bodie doing?
is this what everyone is up in arms about?: http://www.bodenweiser.com/
@John Young No. Except for the headline, it’s all old news.
@liberal geek “Speaking of train wrecks… How’s Bodie doing?”
Well, no one knows or they aren’t telling. What we do know publicly is:
1. There is a rumor of something pretty bad concerning Bodie
2. Bodie’s campaign signs seem to be disappearing
3. Bodie has disappeared
4. Pettyman has filed as a write in candidate
All the rest is speculation.
“Except for the headline, it’s all old news”
LOL, yeah, the headline of Bodies bro talking the DSP Detectives is a minute detail that should be downplayed.
Nothing to see here, move along……
5. Bodies brother has been interviewed by the DSP regarding the rumor.
LOL. Well, I didn’t want to go too far down the rumor road and the headline was kinda covered under 1.
Anyone seen how KSpan’s signs are now being plastered with “Endorsed Alex Pries” stickers? Nice way to leverage sign space.
Alex Pires has a real chance to reach 10% of the vote. Then, after Nov. 6, he can find another hobby. Maybe literally burning stacks of his money will prove as satisfying as doing it figuratively.
Pires will get more than Wade. 30-20.
Not a snowball’s chance of that. Carper will get 60, Wade just under 30, Pires just over 10 — tops.
The normal floor for a Republican is 35; Carper routinely pulls down high 60s. Who do you see bleeding 30% of the vote? Most people have never heard of him and have no idea what he stands for. And if he only gets 6%, I won’t be as surprised as I will be if he gets 20%.
@geezer He had to be able to show UD a poll giving him 10% to get into the debate this week because he does not meet any of the other criteria. That said, I tend to agree with you that Pires’ floor is around 6% and his ceiling is 15-18%. That puts his mid-range right around the 10% mark
Which is why my prediction is 10%, based on the notion that he’ll capture about the same number of voters from each party. He could get more — Spanarelli’s 12% in the primary clearly indicates a number of Democrats unhappy with Carper. But I can’t see many Republicans voting for a guy with no identifiable program.
You are way overestimating party loyalty and utterly discounting the impact of unaffiliateds/third party voters. Pires is going to surprise you. Carper gets his votes because of lackluster opposition and name recognition. Pires is offering a challenge on both grounds. He won’t win, but he’ll do better than you think.
Thanks for the video… Three minutes of my life I’ll never get back.