Day: August 16, 2013

Rep. Steve King (R-IA) is speaking again, this time wondering aloud about why Republicans are even talking about immigration reform.

Said King: "Last year, almost everybody in my conference would've agreed with me on this immigration issue. And this year, it seems as though after the presidential election a spell's been cast over a good number of Republicans and they seem to think the presidential election was about immigration. I'd ask them, find me that debate between Mitt Romney and Barack Obama that addressed immigration. I don't remember it. I can't find it. The election was about jobs and the economy, not immigration. And yet some Republican strategists and leadership have decided let's just go ahead and debate immigration for twelve months and then we'll see if we can solve the problem."

Let's unpack this. First, is Mr. King aware that he and his Republicans lost the election? So if the election were just all about the economy and jobs, then it seems to me that a majority of the American people have, by a large margin, disagreed with his and his Republican views about jobs and the economy. Second, the election wasn't just all about jobs and the economy. It was also about Obamacare. And again, the American people agreed with Obama about Obamacare, not Steven King and the Republicans. So I assume that Steven King and his Republicans will cease their repeal and hostage taking efforts. Third, and most importantly, the election was about immigration reform. Mitt Romney took a hard right stance on self deportation to win the Republican primary. The President instead campaigned on a comprehensive plan that would include border security and a path to citizenship. Once again, Steven King and Mitt Romney lost. The President won. And he won by winning Latinos by 70-30%. The reason why Republicans are talking about immigration reform after the election is because they can no longer lose Latinos by that aforementioned margin and ever again win a national election, based on the group's growing demographics and the declining numbers of angry conservative whites out there. The Republicans, the smart ones anyway, realized that they must repair their relationship with Latinos, and the way to do that was to both modify their stances towards immigration and pass immigration reform. So that is why you and your Republicans are discussing it, Mr. King. But, please proceed Governor... er ah, Congressman King. Please keep talking about Latinos all being drug dealers with cantaloupe calves.

Steve Newton of Delaware Libertarian continues his expose against Highmark and MedExpress and the Insurance Commissioner's complicity in the fleecing that is going on. First, he notes that from some people, including his own representatives, the silence is deafening.

The silence is deafening from the Insurance Commissioner's office. Not only has Nancy Willing inquired at least five times regarding any investigation of this mess, Senator Petersen requested an Insurance Commissioner's inquiry when I sent her the materials, and Dr. Vince Schaller, Medical Director of the Lantana/Hockessin Walk-in Clinic has filed multiple complaints and inquiries. From Karin Weldin Stewart's office: ... crickets ... This [controversy] has also been an ongoing primer [into] who does and doesn't respond to real inquiries from citizens and constituents. I live neither in Petersen's district, nor in John Kowalko's. Both responded almost instantly when I asked. I also always get quick responses from legislators like Paul Baumbach, Brian Bushweller, and Ernie Lopez--again: I live in none of their districts. On the other hand, I have sent all the same information (repeatedly) to Senator Greg Lavelle and Representative Joe Miro. I do live in their district, and Dr. Schaller's clinic is a small business within their district that employs several dozen people, and is the only such clinic in our district. From the two of them: ... crickets ...

Steve goes on to say that he does not want this to be a partisan issue, I guess because he lists several Democrats and one Republican who are responsive on this issue, while his own Republican legislators are not. I agree, it is not a partisan issue. It is an ideological one. The Dems he listed, with the exception of Bushweller, are progressives. Corporate-backed legislators or executives, whether they be Jack Markell or Karen Weldin Stewart or a host of other Democratic and Republican state legislators, are not going to be terribly troubled by this whole Highmark/MedExpress issue. Progressives and libertarians, for their own ideological reasons, will. Steve, in another post, highlights another scam from Highmark and predicts that it will drive BayHealth or ChristianaCare out of business in the next three years. Meanwhile... Mike Matthews is back!!!!