Wilmington Mayor’s Race — Undecided Leads the Pack

Filed in Delaware, Featured by on July 12, 2016

The News Journal released the results of their poll last night, which shows the race being much closer than the common wisdom (including mine) would have suggested. Here’s the numbers:

Kevin Kelly                18%
Mike Purzycki           14%
Dennis Williams      13%
Theo Gregory             11%
Eugene Young             9%
Norm Griffiths            8%
Robert Marshall         2%
Maria Cabrera             2%
Undecided                   21%

The margin of error on this poll is 5.8 and reached landlines only.  This surveyed likely Democratic voters. This polly also asked about registration and primary practices — where we find that this group of likely Democratic voters think that it should be easier to switch parties to vote and that primaries should be open.

So what does this say? You could say that it is anyone’s race. Except for Cabrera and Marshall. With the top tier within the margin of error, you can look at this and know that candidates have reached out and gathered up their base support. And like the NCCo race poll from yesterday, there are a good number of people who are undecided or not yet paying attention.

You could also look at this from Wilmington’s typical elections playbook, whose operating theory is about turning out the greatest number of your friends and relatives:

  • Where there’s more than one white person running, they will split that vote and not be able to capitalize on motivated and reliable white voters to win.  Kelly and Purzycki are splitting the white vote (while Purzycki is likely getting the majority of the switched GOP votes.  Makes sense since he is pretty clearly GOP stalking horse in this Democratic primary.)  Kelley, by virtue of his very deep ties in the community is outperforming Purzycki with African American voters.  Kelly still has the benefit of the Buyer’s Remorse vote.  Purzycki will be unlikely to match that, no matter how much he pays Norman Oliver.  Both will need to expand their base.
  • Whoever can win Districts 1 and 2 wins the City.  This is where Williams and Gregory are really fighting it out.  They are clearly going to split this territory and both will need to expand their base.  This is where Williams won it last go round and he has clearly lost support in this area.  Williams is the incumbent, so being firmly in the middle of this pack with less support than his anemic winning number from 2012 suggests to me that he may have hit his ceiling.  Gregory’s base is here too — which is the flaw in his “not waiting his turn”.  Both will have to get out of their comfort zones to eat into the undecided number.  68% of the polled group think that the city s going in the wrong direction and that is not a good sign for the incumbent Mayor or City Council President.  I’ll add that Griffiths’ base is here too, and while I think that he has an excellent shot at getting votes from other parts of the city, I can’t detect much energy from his campaign to get there.

Eugene Young is not playing by this playbook — he didn’t start with a base of voters who’ve know him for years (or a base of voters handed to him by the Castles).  So he has been building this base one door at a time since September.  With a huge team of volunteers and good fundraising, this is a campaign that started with nothing (except a commitment to bypass the rules and the waiting your turn) and is now clearly in the mix in this tight race.  Right now, he’s in the best position to expand on his numbers, largely because that is what is campaign is organized to do — build a winning coalition rather than turn out your partisans.   One of the consequences of not playing by the Wilmington rulebook is that the Wilmington establishment has been pushing back hard.  Even so, the Wilmington establishment hasn’t been able coalesce and bring any order to this primary field, which should be the signal in how much this establishment is invested in their own interests — not the interests of Wilmington.

One data point that was interesting to me was that with 21% undecided, all of those polled are pretty committed to voting in this primary.  (Notwithstanding the NJ reporting that provides space to people who won’t)  That’s evidence of coalition opportunity for the campaign that can get that work done.

I don’t know what Cabrera or Marshall will do.  Frankly, I think that this poll makes it pretty clear that they should clear the field.  Neither is in a position to win this thing and neither are they in a kingmaker position.  Cabrera has to choose to not run as an incumbent for Wilmington City Council in order to definitively lose the Wilmington Mayor’s race.  Marshall stayed out of the 2012 Mayor’s race (one he declared for) largely because of a poll he commissioned that indicated that both he and Montgomery were pretty far back in the field.  This one shows him further back so he must be in this thing for other reasons.  Again, reasons that have nothing to do with the interests of the City.

So while no candidate is sitting pretty in this poll, I think that Young’s campaign is the one best poised to build, since that is what they’ve been doing for nine months.

 

 

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

About the Author ()

"You don't make progress by standing on the sidelines, whimpering and complaining. You make progress by implementing ideas." -Shirley Chisholm

Comments (11)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Dorian Gray says:

    Yeah, unfortunately this doesn’t do much for me. Margin of error at nearly 600 bps. “Not Sure” responses greater than 1 in 5 over a sample size of 284 land land-line only contacts. (Think about that… ~ 60 respondents out of 284 were uncommitted.)

    One of the fair assumptions you can’t escape here is that older white people who answer land-line phones dig Kelley and Purzycki. Probably could have guessed that before the poll. (I suppose that’s the logical reverse of DD’s young people for Young conclusion.)

    Regrettably, the polling everyone was hoping for clarified nothing. At least the News Journal stepped up and tried. So credit where it’s due there.

  2. I think this is bad news if, like me, you support Eugene Young. Or even if you support Norm Griffiths, Theo Gregory, or Mayor Williams.

    Assuming that the only two no-hopers (Cabrera and Marshall) drop out, you’ve got Purzycki and Kelley as the white candidates, and you have four relatively competitive black candidates.

    Unless one or two from among Young, Griffiths, Gregory or Williams drop out, Kelley or (gag) Purzycki is likely the next mayor.

    I think the poll is also bad news for Dennis Williams. He’s the one guy in the race w/o a name recognition deficit. The people know him. They just don’t like him. Hard to see where he has room to grow his support.

  3. cassandra_m says:

    With so many of them well within the margin of error, this is not apocalyptic. And, as I note, or someone who started from scratch, Eugene is well in the fray here. He has alot of work to get done and has room to get that work done, unlike others in this pool.

    I wouldn’t invest much magic in the cell-phone theory. While it is true that plenty of younger people will have cell-phones only, polls that include cell-phones are much more expensive and may take even more time. One of the narratives in the 2014 midterms was that most of the polls lacked data from cell phones and so thee was not a clear picture of what the Obama voters would do. Turned out the polls knew exactly what the Obama voters would do. I would think that including cell phones would move these numbers a couple of points either way, but I don’t think it shifts anyone out of the margin of error.

  4. cassandra_m says:

    What I came here to say though, is that I was looking at these numbers over lunch and noticed an interesting thing — Maria Cabrera counts no female and no Hispanic support. This is interesting because her theory of winning was that this was the Year of the Woman and that the city has never elected a Hispanic Mayor.

  5. chris says:

    Stick a fork in Cabrera and Marshall! They are well done before they even got started. As John Danielo would call them “vanity campaigns.”

  6. AQC says:

    I wouldn’t invest much in the “split the white vote” theory. If you look at Eugene’s supporters you will see quite a few white people and Kevin’s got quite a few black supporters. I suspect Mike has the Republicans turned Democrat, Dennis has his family members he has given cushy jobs to and their family members who also got jobs and other perks. This poll probably has both of these guys maxed out. Not sure what I think about Norm or Theo; both nice guys but nothing new there and Maria and Bobby just need to let go. I’d say this is going to be a race between Kevin and Eugene.

  7. Well, Eugene’s got the 9% with or w/o the white voters. I’m just looking at the calculus. 4 black candidates and 2 white candidates means that white candidates are more likely to benefit from the ratio than black candidates are.

    There’s also history. Either Montgomery or Kelley win if it’s a one on one with Dennis Williams. The calculus prevailed.

  8. Tom Kline says:

    Black voters need to wake up and realize voting by color is a losing proposition. e.g. Obama..

  9. Ivy says:

    Yes, us black voters need to wake up as we are the only people that vote based on the color of one skins. We have have no other basis for casting our vote…You are so right. Obama only won (twice) solely because of the black vote…thanks for schooling us.

  10. Hmm says:

    Ya Obama is so horrible those black voters really messed that up…

  11. Irwin Fletcher says:

    Leave Obama out of this. F&cking Troll!