Is Trump still President?
I’m seriously asking. My news blackout has been airtight. I assume the Mueller report has catalogued Trump’s many crimes. A few key GOP Senators peeled away from the cult of Trump giving sanity a majority in both houses. The Republic was rescued in a nick of time. That was a crazy three years. I’m glad that it is over.
Snap out of it, life still sucks and Trump’s still stinking up the White House and plotting revenge on his aids. Past and present.
We should have full disclosure and transparency, right?
“1.) When did the FBI first learn that Steele’s dossier was funded by the Clinton campaign and the Democratic Party and written by a partisan who, by his own admission, was desperate to defeat Trump? Documents and testimony I reviewed show senior DOJ official Bruce Ohr first told his colleagues about Steele’s bias and connections to Clinton in late summer 2016. Likewise, sources tell me a string of FBI emails — some before the bureau secured its first surveillance warrant — raised concerns about Steele’s motive, employer and credibility.
2.) How much evidence of innocence did the FBI possess against two of its early targets, Trump campaign advisers George Papadopoulos and Carter Page? My sources tell me that agents secured evidence of the innocence of both men from informants, intercepts and other techniques that was never disclosed to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court judges in the case. I’m told learning exactly the sort of surveillance used on Page also may surprise some people.
3.) Why was the Steele dossier used as primary evidence in the FISA warrant against Page when it had not been corroborated? FBI testimony I reviewed shows agents had just begun checking out the dossier when its elements were used as supporting evidence, and that spreadsheets kept by the bureau during the verification process validated only small pieces of the dossier while concluding other parts were false or unprovable. And, of course, former FBI lawyer Lisa Page admitted that, after nine months of investigation, the dossier’s core allegation of Trump-Russia collusion could not be substantiated.
4.) Why were Steele’s biases and his ties to the Clinton campaign — as well as evidence of innocence and flaws in the FISA evidence — never disclosed to the FISA court, as required by law and court practice?
5.) Why did FBI and U.S. intelligence officials leak stories about evidence in the emerging Russia probe before they corroborated collusion, and were any of those leaks designed to “create” evidence that could be cited in the courts of law and public opinion to justify the continuation of a flawed investigation?
6.) Did Comey improperly handle classified information when he distributed memos of his private conversations with Trump to his lawyers and a friend and ordered a leak that he hoped would cause the appointment of a special counsel after his firing as FBI director?
7.) Did the CIA, FBI or Obama White House engage in activities — such as the activation of intelligence sources or electronic surveillance — before the opening of an official counterintelligence investigation against the Trump campaign on July 31, 2016?
8.) Did U.S. intelligence, the FBI or the Obama administration use or encourage friendly spy agencies in Great Britain, Australia, Ukraine, Italy or elsewhere to gather evidence on the Trump campaign, leak evidence, or get around U.S. restrictions on spying on Americans?
9.) Did the CIA or Obama intelligence apparatus try to lure or pressure the FBI into opening a Trump collusion probe or acknowledge its existence before the election? Text messages between alleged FBI lovebirds Strzok and Page raised concerns about “pressure” from the White House, the “Agency BS game,” DOJ leaks and the need for an FBI “insurance policy.” And, as Strzok texted at one point in August 2016, quoting a colleague: “The White House is running this.”
10.) Did any FBI agents, intelligence officials or other key players in the probe provide false testimony to Congress? McCabe already has been singled out by the inspector general for lying about a media leak to an internal DOJ probe, and evidence emerged this year that calls into question Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson’s testimony about his contacts with Ohr.”
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/439234-ten-post-mueller-questions-that-could-turn-the-tables-on-russia-collusion
There’s the Hill article you stole that from, you fucking idiot.
Pro-tip for seemingly “well-thought out” comments from trolls who are typically Pakleds in their intellect… just copy-paste google search their whole comment to find where they ripped it from.
you’re a pathetic grifter dude. just like your Daddy and his illegal immigrant wife.
Plagiarist!
Quotation marks.
The accepted method is to provide a link. Reprinting the whole article is a no-no.
@ben-Blind fool. I’m not going to hold back anymore on your ignorance, stupidity, and just plain bad manners.
haha, ok dumbass.
Try and remember I’m fairly sure you’re a poorly written algorithm. so best of luck, you plagiarizing, non-original thought having, magat-ass pile of trash.
Nice…lol.
No, buddy. He’s gone. We got him! You can rest easy and relax. Here, look out there at that patch of land. That’s where we’re gonna raise the rabbits, Lenny! Yeah, pal.. Think of the rabbits.
lol, RSE loves him some conspiracy theory. Son, you should go up against the wall with the rest of the dopeycon traitors.
Really dude? Are you really this dumb?
That last sentence on #2 is awesome! “My sources” Hahaha
Dude’s a landscaper. Probably inhales a lot of gasoline fumes.
It’s not the fumes it’s the chemicals, because the boomers can’t have a single weed on their lawns for some reason…Clover is a good thing people.
At least he’s working for his $$$.
And you? Do you have a job? Do you have the balls to say what it is? If not, you’re invited to fuck yourself with a light bulb.
There are many redactions in the report related to the “friendly spy agencies” and the material they gathered.
This is extremely simple: The US security agencies still consider Russia their No. 1 enemy. When someone has a lot of contacts with Russia, they take notice. Underneath those redactions are intercepted communications that show the Trump team was indeed in contact with a hostile foreign government. That stuff is redacted to protect the methods that procured the information, but the Trumpkins are using it to pretend any of this is in doubt.
I’d bang Ivana
No accounting for taste.
I’d do that too!
Are you sure you didn’t mean Ivanka? Not my type but I could at least understand that.
Ivanka’s birthname is Ivana. Apparently Ivanka is a nickname. Who’s up for a hatef*** mother/daughter 3way?
Septuagenarian fetish
lol