The Brady Exoneration

Filed in Delaware by on September 13, 2021

Here’s the report of the House Ethics Committee on the complaint against Rep. Gerald Brady:

Committee Vote: Complaint fails to allege facts which constitute a violation of the Rules of Legislative Conduct and no further action will be taken by the House Ethics Committee; 5-0

Committee Findings:
The Ethics Committee of the House of Representatives of the 151st General Assembly met on September 10, 2021 to consider a complaint lodged against Representative Gerald Brady based on his use of a racial slur in an e-mail in June 2021, as widely reported in local media. The Committee has unanimously determined that while the members [sic] choice of words was reprehensible, and without condoning his expression, this incident does not rise to the level of a violation of the Rules of Legislative Conduct and no further action will be taken by this Committee.

While it is manifestly the business of this Committee to ensure the decorum of House proceedings and to punish unlawful and unethical conduct that reflects upon the integrity of the House, there is no precedent for policing the lawful expression of opinions or a member’s choice of words in what he believed to be correspondence with a private citizen. Determining which ideas and manners of expression are beyond the pale is first and foremost the province of voters. The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects freedom of speech and it would run contrary to those principles to punish “the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable.”

In determining that no further action will be taken, the Committee notes that the member has issued an apology, already completed a sensitivity training course, and indicated his intention not to stand for election when his current term is complete.

About the Author ()

Who wants to know?

Comments (5)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. El Somnambulo says:

    Man, that ‘sensitivity training’ can sure wash away a lot of sins.

    Bottom line: When the least ethical member of the General Assembly runs the Ethics Committee, nobody’s behavior is at risk.

  2. Valentine says:

    I think we need to add not making racist, misogynistic, and homophobic comments to the Code of Ethics. If you don’t respect the basic principle of human equality, you have no business holding office in a democracy.

    • El Somnambulo says:

      With all the downstate mouthbreathers, the sexist ex-cops, and the upstate construction trades guys in that body?

      Worthy thought, no chance. At least, not yet.

  3. Arthur says:

    Ethics is doing what is right when no one is looking. Some the entire legislature doesn’t do that why even have an ethics committee? And they hung up on the “unlawful’. Well if what he did was illegal hopefully he would have been arrested. Oh wait.

    • El Somnambulo says:

      The only reason to have Ethics Committees is to create the illusion that unethical behavior will be policed.

      Up until this year, Nicole Poore was on the Senate Ethics Committee. Tony DeLuca was previously on the Senate Ethics Committee. Val Longhurst chairs the House Ethics Committee.

      These are only the more recent examples.

      Legislative ethics has been an oxymoron forever. Something Rep. Wilson-Anton seeks to change. I wish her well.