Our PAL Val Screws Up ‘Permit To Purchase’: Incompetence Or Malice?

Filed in Delaware, Featured by on January 30, 2024

Longhurst promised to run the bill in January.  Longhurst didn’t run the bill in January.  From the News-Journal article:

Despite Delaware House leadership’s pledge to pass gun safety legislation upon lawmakers’ return to Dover in January, a bill to require training and a permit prior to purchase of a handgun hasn’t made it to a vote.

House Democrats in December announced the Appropriations Committee had approved the bill and House Speaker Valerie Longhurst in a Dec. 14 news release reiterated her commitment to getting the legislation passed when the full House reconvened in January.

“For the past decade, we have passed some of the most comprehensive gun safety laws in the country, making Delaware a leader by strengthening our background checks, closing loopholes, banning assault-style firearms and large-capacity magazines, and instituting red flag laws,” Longhurst said in the December news release. “This bill is the next piece of the puzzle to keeping our communities safe and I’m looking forward to bringing permit to purchase to the House floor as soon as we return to session in January.” 

Blahblahblah.

The bill had already passed the Senate on May 2, 2023.  All D’s had voted for it, all R’s had voted against it.  The bill had cleared both the House Judiciary and Appropriations Committees.   All that remained was for the Speaker to place it on an Agenda, as it had the votes to pass.  The Speaker didn’t.

Oh, the bill?:

(1) Creates an application process to obtain a handgun qualified purchaser permit to authorize the purchase of a handgun. While an applicant will incur costs related to fingerprinting and required training, a fee will not be charged to obtain the permit. A holder of a valid concealed carry permit, a qualified law-enforcement officer, and a qualified retired law-enforcement officer are not required to obtain or present a handgun qualified purchaser permit. (2) Prohibits a licensed importer, manufacturer, or dealer, as well as unlicensed persons, from selling or transferring a handgun to an individual unless the individual has a handgun qualified purchaser permit. (3) Requires that an applicant complete a firearms training course within 5 years before the date of application, similar to what is required by Delaware’s concealed carry permit law. (4) Makes clear that § 904A of Title 24 is not intended to prohibit law-enforcement officials from keeping records. (5) Requires the Department of Safety and Homeland Security to develop and administer a firearms training voucher program for low-income residents to provide low-income residents with a voucher to cover the costs of the firearms training course required under Section 1 of this Act.

You may well ask why didn’t Longhurst run the bill as promised.  Here’s what passes for the explanation:

House Democratic spokesperson Jenevieve Worley said legislative leaders plan to run the bill in March when lawmakers return for session. 

She said recent inclement weather and uncertainty around Gov. John Carney’s rescheduling of the State of the State address forced the House to remain flexible and keep schedules open. 

In other words, she gets paid to lie so that Our PAL Val doesn’t have to.  Not that that ever stopped her before.  Yes, they lost a day due to inclement weather.  Yes, Carney had to postpone his State Of The State until March.  That’s it.  They had seven legislative days to run the bill.  And didn’t.  Even if you subtract the three ‘committee’ days, which shouldn’t have prevented Val from keeping her promise, you had four days where the House did run agendas.  Everything passed except the one important bill that Longhurst had promised to place on an agenda.  That one bill was never placed on an agenda.

As usual, Our PAL Val gave away the game:

Worley stressed the bill is something that will draw a lot of attention, and legislators will want to take their time to get the legislation done right.

In other words, she wants to give the Usual Suspects yet another chance to weaken the bill.  The legislation was already done right.  The original bill was introduced on April 19.  The bill was considered in the Senate Judiciary Committee on April 26.  A substitute, that addressed concerns raised in committee, was introduced on May 2.  The bill passed the Senate on May 2.  It was assigned to the House Judiciary Committee on May 3 and released from the committee on May 17.  Since money to carry out the bill had already been included in the Budget Bill, it could have directly gone to the Ready List.  However, Speaker Pete dumped it into Lumpy Carson’s Appropriations Committee, where it languished until session ended.

The bill was finally released from Appropriations on December 14, at which time Longhurst promised it would be run in January.  It wasn’t.  One or both of these things is possible:

Val delayed the bill so that the pro-gun nuts could further weaken it.

Val is incompetent.

A distinction without a difference.

About the Author ()

Comments (6)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Kevis Greene says:

    My guess is they need to adjust the dials a bit more to ensure that violation of P2P really only affects black men. Since the decriminalization of marijuana the carney admin needs to give the state alternative powers to entrap, prosecute, and imprison black men. If anyone thinks a low income voucher system is going to be accessible or administered effectively, they are clueless.

  2. Anon says:

    My guess is they need to adjust the dials a bit more to ensure that violation of P2P really only affects black men.

    LOL. Funny because it is true.

  3. Stewball says:

    Did this reporter actually pose the question — “Do you have the votes to pass the bill right now?” If Val had the votes, she’d put the bill on the floor. There is probably enough opposition from the likes of Billy Bush, Kim Williams, etc. to make a vote a close call now if they don’t somehow water down the bill. Will be interested to see the language of any amendment or substitue bill that comes out between now and when they reconvene after JFC.

    • Allow me to quote from Val’s mouthpiece as to why they didn’t run the bill:

      “House Democratic spokesperson Jenevieve Worley said legislative leaders plan to run the bill in March when lawmakers return for session.

      She said recent inclement weather and uncertainty around Gov. John Carney’s rescheduling of the State of the State address forced the House to remain flexible and keep schedules open.”

  4. Bill DM says:

    OR they know the debate will be long on this bill because the GOP will go full victim-blaming here in their defense of the poor guns. When you’ve got a bill you know is going to eat up a ton of time, you’ve got to plan for it. Doesn’t excuse making the pledge in December if you knew it was tenuous with limited available days.

    However, I did notice they had a bunch of absences in the Dem caucus nearly every day (I think Madinah missed a couple, and so did a few others). Not sure if that pulled them below 21, but it’s worth noting (there were three missing on the last day, for example).

    I’ll worry and wring my hands when I actually see an amendment weakening the bill. Until then, I’ll just expect to hold them to passing it when they get back in March.

  5. The MoMo says:

    She does this with so many important bills, although maybe not to the extent of like putting out a timeline on it but still. Talk about it in the press (and on the campaign trail) and trust that voters are too busy struggling to survive to pay attention to the actual shenanigans. She has done it with abortion, LGBT+ rights, gender equity, I am sure there are more. So many things with her name on em, whether in press or as a sponsor, end up being just pieces of paper.