BREAKING: Supreme Court Strikes Down Most Trump Tariffs

Filed in Featured, National by on February 20, 2026 4 Comments

From the NYTimes:

The Supreme Court ruled on Friday that President Trump exceeded his authority when he imposed sweeping tariffs on imports from nearly every U.S. trading partner, a major setback for his administration’s second-term agenda.

The court’s 6-3 decision has significant implications for the U.S. economy, consumers and the president’s trade policy. The Trump administration had said that a loss at the Supreme Court could force the government to unwind trade deals with other countries and potentially pay hefty refunds to importers.

Mr. Trump is the first president to claim that a 1970s emergency statute, which does not mention the word “tariffs,” allowed him to unilaterally impose the duties without congressional approval.

Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. said the statute does not authorize the president to impose tariffs.

“The president asserts the extraordinary power to unilaterally impose tariffs of unlimited amount, duration, and scope. In light of the breadth, history, and constitutional context of that asserted authority, he must identify clear congressional authorization to exercise it,” the chief justice wrote.

Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel A. Alito Jr. and Brett M. Kavanaugh dissented, with Justice Kavanaugh warning that any refund process could be a substantial “mess.”

Well, yes, a ‘mess’ entirely caused by Trump.

About the Author ()

Comments (4)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Arthur says:

    this was really surprising. the right move but surprising.

  2. Alby says:

    Josh Marshall makes an excellent point:

    [T]oday’s decision is actually an indictment of the Court. These tariffs have been in effect for almost a year. They have upended whole sectors of the U.S. and global economies. The fact that a president can illegally exercise such powers for so long and with such great consequences for almost a year means we’re not living in a functional constitutional system.

    If the Constitution allows untrammeled and dictatorial powers for almost one year, massive dictator mulligans, then there is no Constitution.

    The Court is corrupt. There’s no future for the America republic without thoroughly reforming it of its current corruption. Today’s decision is simply one of those cases where the Constitution happens to coincide with the Court’s partial and illegitimate self-interest.

  3. Anne says:

    I’ve thought for a long time that the SC just tosses us a bone every so often with a decision that’s reasonable and would have been hardly worth noticing with prior panel of justices. This decision is one of those bones.

Leave a Reply to Jason Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *