DL Open Thread: Monday, April 20, 2026

Filed in Featured, Open Thread by on April 20, 2026 7 Comments

Looks Like Debbie Hudson Capano Screwed Yorklyn Real Good.

A small northern Delaware community is looking to stop a luxury townhome development through any means necessary — including a lawsuit.

Yorklyn residents for years have opposed developments on former industrial land in the Auburn Valley redevelopment district, which did not go through the county’s land use process due to a unique state plan. They worry their wells will run dry, traffic congestion will worsen and local wildlife won’t have a place to go.

The resident group has notched several wins. Delaware’s Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC), which administers the redevelopment district, denied an apartment proposal and bought almost 30 acres of the land for $6 million to add to Auburn Valley State Park.

But three townhome development projects remain, totaling about 130 homes. And one of those projects, called Quarry Walk, is slated to begin construction sometime this month.

But DNREC Secretary Gregory Patterson said the three developments are in their final stages and “have the legal right to proceed.” Patterson was not in office when the agency signed the agreements.

“We have addressed a lot of the concerns and have generally made the place better,” Patterson said. “But there is a point at which you can’t undo previous decisions.”

Those previous decisions?  That’s where Hudson (‘Don’t call me Capano’) comes in:

Typically, land use decisions are made by Delaware counties and proposals go through multiple public forums before approval. But in the case of Yorklyn, those approvals were signed with DNREC behind closed doors, without community involvement.

The agency gained land use authority over parts of Yorklyn Ridge through the Auburn Valley Master Plan, designed to clean up the former industrial lands with a combination of state and private development funds.

The land under the master plan was not subject to New Castle County’s zoning and regulatory authority due to state legislation that was approved to exempt it. Instead, all approvals, zoning decisions and subdivision plans fell to DNREC.  (Back when DNREC secretaries were rubber stamps for pro-development plans because ‘jobsjobsjobs’.

This was dirty Delaware Way insiderism created by the one legislator perhaps most intimately familiar with skirting land use requirements at the time.   Just don’t call her ‘Capano’.

For Once, Trump Will Give Money Back.  Because the Supreme Court made him do it:

When President Trump unveiled his sprawling global tariffs last spring, he boasted that they would generate windfall profits and “make America wealthy again.”

But after suffering a significant Supreme Court defeat, Mr. Trump is about to pay the money back.

The Trump administration on Monday is set to take its first steps toward returning more than $166 billion collected from tariffs that were struck down in February. Just over a year after imposing many of the duties, the government is expected to begin accepting requests for refunds, surrendering its prized source of revenue — plus interest.

For some U.S. businesses, the highly anticipated refunds could be substantial, offering critical if belated financial relief. Tariffs are taxes on imports, so the president’s trade policies have served as a great burden for companies that rely on foreign goods. Many have had to choose whether to absorb the duties, cut other costs or pass on the expenses to consumers.

By Monday morning, those companies can begin to submit documentation to the government to recover what they paid in illegal tariffs. In a sign of the demand, more than 3,000 businesses, including FedEx and Costco, have already sued the Trump administration in a bid to secure their refunds, with some cases filed even before the Supreme Court’s ruling.

Sad.  We’re still screwed, though:

But only the entities that officially paid the tariffs are eligible to recover that money. That means that the fuller universe of people affected by Mr. Trump’s policies — including millions of Americans who paid higher prices for the products they bought — are not able to apply for direct relief.

FBI Head Too Drunk To Drive Drunk?:

He is erratic, suspicious of others, and prone to jumping to conclusions before he has necessary evidence, according to the more than two dozen people I interviewed about Patel’s conduct, including current and former FBI officials, staff at law-enforcement and intelligence agencies, hospitality-industry workers, members of Congress, political operatives, lobbyists, and former advisers. Speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive information and private conversations, they described Patel’s tenure as a management failure and his personal behavior as a national-security vulnerability.

They said that the problems with his conduct go well beyond what has been previously known, and include both conspicuous inebriation and unexplained absences. His behavior has often alarmed officials at the FBI and the Department of Justice, even as he won support from the White House for his eager participation in Trump’s effort to turn federal law enforcement against the president’s perceived political enemies.

Several officials told me that Patel’s drinking has been a recurring source of concern across the government. They said that he is known to drink to the point of obvious intoxication, in many cases at the private club Ned’s in Washington, D.C., while in the presence of White House and other administration staff. He is also known to drink to excess at the Poodle Room, in Las Vegas, where he frequently spends parts of his weekends. Early in his tenure, meetings and briefings had to be rescheduled for later in the day as a result of his alcohol-fueled nights, six current and former officials and others familiar with Patel’s schedule told me.

On multiple occasions in the past year, members of his security detail had difficulty waking Patel because he was seemingly intoxicated, according to information supplied to Justice Department and White House officials. A request for “breaching equipment”—normally used by SWAT and hostage-rescue teams to quickly gain entry into buildings—was made last year because Patel had been unreachable behind locked doors, according to multiple people familiar with the request.

Did I say ‘Too Drunk To Drive Drunk’?  Why, yes, yes I did:

 

Ah, I see you’re awake now.

The First Senator From The Post-Trump Democratic Party?:

In 2002, my classmate Graham Platner ran for student-body president of John Bapst Memorial High School in Bangor, Maine. I remember watching him in our auditorium debate his fellow candidates. He was the radical, wearing a revolutionary proletarian costume: overalls and a red armband. (When I asked him about this recently, he told me he thought he had a history presentation to give that day.) I don’t recall the issues they discussed, but I do remember Platner proposing collective action to overturn some school policy — saying something along the lines of, “They can’t suspend us all.” The history teacher serving as moderator interjected to remind Platner and everyone else that, yes, in fact, they could.

Students elected the safe candidate, a future chiropractor. But Platner had other outlets for his energy and ideas. Around that time, he skipped school to protest the coming Iraq war when George W. Bush visited our local airport — and was forcibly removed by the Secret Service. In the high school yearbook, our class voted him “most likely to start a revolution.”

What in the world is going on here? On the surface, Platner vs. Mills is just the latest chapter in the populist-left vs. establishment-center struggle that has been roiling the Democratic Party since Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders faced off in 2016. And the race certainly is that: Platner has been endorsed by Sanders and Sen. Elizabeth Warren; Mills is backed by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear.

But over the past few months, as I attended events and interviewed more than 50 people — former and current state officials, Democratic voters, local political experts, Platner and Mills themselves and those who know them — I came to suspect that something related, but also more specific, was at play: This race has become perhaps the country’s clearest referendum on how Democrats should be responding to Trumpism.

Since 2016, Democrats have debated whether or not the fundamental problem is Donald Trump himself or the circumstances that produced him. Mills has become a kind of personification of the first view. Outside of Maine, she may be best known for a viral moment from last year, when, at a White House event for the nation’s governors, Trump called her out directly, saying he would pull all federal funding from Maine if it refused to comply with the administration’s executive order on transgender girls and women in sports. From the audience, Mills responded coolly, “See you in court.”

Now, she has built her campaign around a promise to go toe-to-toe with the president. In a phone interview in February, I asked her directly whether she believes Trump is the symptom or the disease. “Good grief. I would like to think, I would like to believe that it’s a fluke,” she said. “But I know one thing: Whatever the origins, whatever the cause, we have to stand up to him. And I’m the person in this campaign who has stood up to Donald Trump, and I’ll do it again in the U.S. Senate.”

Platner is up to something different. He isn’t running a campaign so much as seeking to build a mass movement against the status quo. He’s not trying to woo the working class to the Democratic Party; he’s trying to mobilize the working class to take over the Democratic Party and use it to fundamentally change the relationship between government and citizens. To him, Trump is a symptom of a larger rot, a fundamentally broken system, and the old rules of American politics are already beside the point. The Democratic establishment is “still existing in this world where they think that if you know the rules the best, you’re going to win,” he told me. “When the other side is just beating you over the head with the rule book, it doesn’t matter.”

Amen, brother.

What do you want to talk about?

About the Author ()

Comments (7)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Mainer says:

    Platner? They guy with the Nazi tattoo? The guy that called rural Mainers racist and stupid? The one that said sexual assault victims should “take some responsibility”? Good luck.

    • Alby says:

      I think you mean “the guy with an enormous lead in the Democratic primary.” Get used to it.

      Kind of amusing to see the freakout in some quarters over this guy. As if these things would keep him from winning a general election in which a lot of MAGAts will be voting.

      Will he be another Fetterman? I dunno. Is he stroke-prone?

  2. Kash Sues Over Drunkenness Story. I’m sure his boss approves,might even enable him to hang onto his job:

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2026/apr/20/trump-tariff-refund-politics-vance-congress-latest-updates

    “FBI director Kash Patel has filed a lawsuit against the Atlantic magazine over an article, published last week, that details Patel’s alleged chronic drinking and frequent absences from work.

    In a court filing with the Washington DC district court, Patel has sued the Atlantic, and the author of the piece, Sarah Fitzpatrick. According to the filing, Patel seeks $250m in damages, listing the nature of the suit as “libel, assault and slander”. A full copy of the complaint was not immediately available.

    The article cites a number of conversations with current and former officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, who claim that the FBI director drinks to excess and has been unreachable at times during his tenure in office. The piece also stated that Patel is concerned he might soon be fired.”

    $250 mill, eh? Might be able to score some Pappy Van Winkle with that kinda dough.

  3. mediawatch says:

    He’d have a better case if he had waited for Trump to fire him. Then he could at least claim 3 years of lost salary.
    The $250 million is farcical but only the demented narcissist can damages in the 10-figure realm.

  4. Nancy Willing says:

    Was Hudson’s involvement spelled out somewhere? I don’t doubt it. This reminded me of her part in the corruption allowed by all levels of local government involved during the Minner admin with respect to the Hercules Country Club, Hudson’s son, Sherry Freebery’s son, and a few others in the plot to develop it.

    I’ll have to dig up one of Al’s columns as I’m sure he’d have written about it. I would need to refresh my memory but suffice to say, a youthful five member team purchased the property for development and the way was paved for them to get away with a crap load of bull that might even lead to future sickness and death for unlucky surrounding residents from the poisonous golf course greens dust released into the air.

  5. Nancy Willing says:

    My other Hudson pet peeve was her applying for Chris Coons public county tax payer funding for maintenance repair for her private wealthy neighborhood storm water facility (despite that them making the required payment for repairs is in specified in their deeds) while they held the same amount of money waiting to spend on playground upgrades. The amount was $150k from what I recall.

Leave a Reply to mediawatch Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *