Foster Children Only Deserve Second Best

Filed in National by on April 25, 2011

A Michigan Republican legislator thinks one way to balance the budget is to make sure children in foster care only receive secondhand clothing.

Under a new budget proposal from State Sen. Bruce Casswell, children in the state’s foster care system would be allowed to purchase clothing only in used clothing stores.

Casswell, a Republican representing Branch, Hillsdale, Lenawee and St. Joseph counties, made the proposal this week, reports Michigan Public Radio.

His explanation?

“I never had anything new,” Caswell says. “I got all the hand-me-downs. And my dad, he did a lot of shopping at the Salvation Army, and his comment was — and quite frankly it’s true — once you’re out of the store and you walk down the street, nobody knows where you bought your clothes.”

Under his plan, foster children would receive gift cards that could only be used at places like the Salvation Army, Goodwill and other second hand clothing stores.

What better way to tell children they aren’t good enough than to only allow them secondhand clothes. Don’t get me wrong – I love Goodwill and the Salvation Army. You can find nice clothes there, but kids sometimes want and need new clothes. It’s too bad that MJ isn’t giving out the “asshat of the day” award anymore, because I think Michigan State Senator Bruce Caswell probably deserves it.

Tags: ,

About the Author ()

Opinionated chemist, troublemaker, blogger on national and Delaware politics.

Comments (16)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. socialistic ben says:

    These are also kids who, when they were fetuses, these conservatives thought the world of and felt should be protected by any means possible.

  2. Jason330 says:

    It is getting pretty difficult for Republicans to “out asshole” each other and continuously one-up each other in terms of cruelty.

    But I’m sure there is still unexplored country out there for enterprising Republicans. (“Hey, Why not foster children and other welfare recipients made to run on treadmills that create electricity?”) They seem to have a unique genius for this kind of thing.

  3. anon says:

    Nothing has changed since they tried to make ketchup a vegetable.

    Actually nothing has changed since the Poor Laws Dickens wrote about:

    The Act aimed to reduce the burden on rate payers…

    Dickens:

    “At this festive season of the year, Mr. Scrooge,” said the gentleman, taking up a pen, “it is more than usually desirable that we should make some slight provision for the Poor and Destitute, who suffer greatly at the present time. Many thousands are in want of common necessaries; hundreds of thousands are in want of common comforts, sir.”

    “Are there no prisons?” asked Scrooge.

    “Plenty of prisons,” said the gentleman, laying down the pen again.

    “And the Union workhouses?” demanded Scrooge. “Are they still in operation?”

    “They are. Still,” returned the gentleman, “I wish I could say they were not.”

    “The Treadmill and the Poor Law are in full vigour, then?” said Scrooge.

    “Both very busy, sir.”

    “Oh! I was afraid, from what you said at first, that something had occurred to stop them in their useful course,” said Scrooge. “I’m very glad to hear it.”

    “Under the impression that they scarcely furnish Christian cheer of mind or body to the multitude,” returned the gentleman, “a few of us are endeavouring to raise a fund to buy the Poor some meat and drink and means of warmth. We choose this time, because it is a time, of all others, when Want is keenly felt, and Abundance rejoices. What shall I put you down for?”

    “Nothing!” Scrooge replied.

    “You wish to be anonymous?”

    “I wish to be left alone,” said Scrooge. “Since you ask me what I wish, gentlemen, that is my answer. I don’t make merry myself at Christmas and I can’t afford to make idle people merry. I help to support the establishments I have mentioned — they cost enough; and those who are badly off must go there.”

    “Many can’t go there; and many would rather die.”

    “If they would rather die,” said Scrooge, “they had better do it, and decrease the surplus population. Besides — excuse me — I don’t know that.”

    “But you might know it,” observed the gentleman.

    “It’s not my business,” Scrooge returned. “It’s enough for a man to understand his own business, and not to interfere with other people’s. Mine occupies me constantly. Good afternoon, gentlemen!”

  4. MJ says:

    UI, as Jason pointed out, there aren’t enough hours in the day to vet the potential nominees.

  5. v says:

    So where do these kids buy underwear/bras/socks and shoes?

    yeah I know they sell shoes at goodwill but have you ever bought a pair? just not one of those things that re-sells very well unless they’re dress shoes you only wore a handful of times or like baby sneakers. And really, would YOU buy underwear at the Goodwill? I shop there, but that is just not happening. I don’t even think they sell socks.

    I’m not even thinking about self-esteem. Some things just need to be new.

  6. skippertee says:

    “I complained, because I had no shoes. Then I met a man who had no feet.” Bric-a-Brac in neighbors’ window
    That BLUNT-SKULL must have read this somewhere.

  7. delbert says:

    Great cost cutting measure that will build character and decrease that aire of entitlement assumed by so many trough-feeders. “Let them eat cake!”

  8. cassandra_m says:

    I wouldn’t make that assumption, socialistic Ben. Delbert’s deep resentments against people who need some help is part of the GOP DNA these days. One can only wish that he is subject to the kind of “character building” that he wishes on these kids Really Soon. Because that comment pretty much demonstrates exactly who is in need of the character building here.

  9. socialistic ben says:

    although, based on your past posts, i cant be sure… im going to assume that is satire so i dont vomit.

  10. socialistic ben says:

    well, when it happens to repukes, they go hat-in-hand to their non-taxed churches assuming God will bail them out… because you know… conservative republicans are such good christians.

  11. TGMV says:

    So since he never had something new, foster kids shouldn’t either? That’s a hell of a rationale.

  12. V says:

    Did you know that Michele Bachmann has been a foster mom to 23 children? I wonder what she thinks of this…

    (even if a little of her crazy rubbed off the them, good for her. makes her seem a little more like a person and not a crazed vengence tea-demon)

  13. socialistic ben says:

    well V,
    $t Sarah MOCKED research to help study and identify mental disorders such as Downs Syndrome because it was politically advantageous for her to do so…. and she’s Trigs biological mom (or grandmother….we dont really know)
    Im sure the Angelina Jolie of the Teaparty will get on her high horse about foster kids having so good because im sure she treats HERS very well. It’s all those other little liberal leaches that need to be taught frugality.

  14. Joe-Joe the Dog Faced Boy says:

    The continuing exploitation of the children of celebrities must stop. Knox and Viviene Jolie/Pitt are the latest example. Their parents pimped out pictures of them to the highest bidder to the tune of a reported $11 million dollars.Then, for tax purposes or their own self-indulgent gratification, donated the money to charity. That was Knox and Viviene’s money.They were the focus of the pictures and the deal wouldn’t exist if they didn’t exist!
    I was also exploited as a child. My parents never missed an opportunity to sell my picture or likeness to the press.They actively exploited me for many years. I know they made money off of me but I never saw any of it. All I got was a couple of chew toys and a used tennis ball.

  15. Phil says:

    We need someone equally wacky to push for abortions up to the 72nd trimester to offset these costs.

  16. Joe-Joe the Dog Faced Boy says:

    Yes Phil,I understand your logic.
    I am looking at the 216th trimester at the moment. I plan on “catching” a car.