Coons Calls for Change in Afghan Strategy
In an op-ed in the News Journal this morning, Sen. Chris Coons, arguing that the current strategy is unsustainable, is calling for a change in our mission in Afghanistan, from occupation and nation-building to a counterterrorism approach.
Faced with the task of charting a responsible course out of Afghanistan, President Obama will soon announce whether the conclusion of America’s decade-long war there will begin with a significant withdrawal of U.S. troops or take a modest step in the direction of an eventual drawdown.
Instead of dwelling on the precise size of that withdrawal, Delawareans should listen for a strong explanation of our nation’s long-term strategy in the region. A substantial drawdown of forces — which I support — should not be the first step on a course of total disengagement from Afghanistan. Rather, it should mark the beginning of a new, more targeted counter-terrorism strategy that more wisely focuses our military and diplomatic resources on defending America’s security interests.
At a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing last week, the president’s nominee for ambassador to Afghanistan, Ryan Crocker, said that our objective for Afghanistan was to help build “governance that is good enough to ensure that the country doesn’t degenerate back into a safe haven for al-Qaeda.”
He urged that we not walk away from Afghanistan now.I responded by agreeing that we shouldn’t abruptly abandon Afghanistan, but pressed: How long will we stay and with how many troops? “I just don’t know the answer now,” he replied.
That is f#*king outrageous. “I just don’t know the answer now.” You know, that would be an acceptable answer from Crocker or any Ambassador to Afghanistan back in 2003. Not 2011. You know what, if Afghanistan can’t get on its own feet after 10 years, thousands of American lives and trillions…. yes, trillions of American dollars, then fuck Afghanistan. It never deserved our help and has done nothing to earn it continuously until the end of time, which is what Crocker’s answer really is.
If we have learned anything from the Bin Laden operation is that America can fight terrorism without invading and occupying countries until the end of time. We can keep a carrier group in the Persian Gulf and the Indian Ocean and routinely carpet bomb the country if it becomes a safe haven again for Al Queda.
In an interview with the Huffington Post, the good Senator agrees with me:
“This was not an easy place for me to come to,” said Coons in an interview with The Huffington Post. “I support our troops, I support our commander in chief — it is not easy to disagree with their current strategy. There are lots of very dedicated, very determined, very capable men and women serving us in Afghanistan who really want the opportunity to prove that this current strategy can work. I just hear broad skepticism at home that another few years at 100,000 troops and more than $100 billion a year is going to change the outcome.”
Coons visited Afghanistan in February, and came away convinced that more of the U.S. focus needed to be directed toward Pakistan.
Like a growing number of his colleagues, Coons is arguing for a shift away from a counterinsurgency campaign toward a counterterrorism approach. He pointed to the killing of Osama bin Laden — accomplished by a team of a couple dozen Navy SEALs — as one example of how a large boots-on-the-ground presence is not necessarily the most successful strategy.
“Osama bin Laden ought to be a moment that makes us reevaluate our strategy,” he said. “I’m trying to be very careful to not be misunderstood to be advocating for ‘the job is done, the threat is done, we can withdraw all American forces.’ That is not the case. I don’t believe that. There are still very dangerous people affiliated with very active groups in Pakistan and to some extent, still in Afghanistan.”
“I just think we need to make sure that our investment in Afghanistan is scaled appropriately toward the threat,” Coons explained.
And I will tell you what else… I will not rebuild another country until the end of time half way across the world while we tear down our own country here at home with draconian budget cuts to everything and anything. There is no way in Hell I will accept building schools in Afghanistan while cutting education budgets at home. There is no way I will accept building hospitals over there while ending Medicare at home. No way.
The answer was obvious to me four years ago during my “overseas visit.” It’s time to get out of Iraq and Afghanistan.
The “investment” in Afghanistan has proven a failure.
Unless the new plan is to leave now and inform the Afghan gov’t that we won’t be coming back, I don’t want to hear it.
And the final paragraph by Del Dem sums up my feelings entirely. There is no dialog from the left about paying for these wars. Republicants want to cut cut cut here, but are willfully blind to the costs of these wars.
Progressives arent standing still regarding all these wars. There are many national groups who are opposed to and petitioning Congress to end all these wars, even Libya. The problem is that lame stream media isnt reporting on those stories, probably because companies like GE, are making billions off the wars. Alternative media is all over this issue, but you have to hunt to find those sources. I noticed Coons never mentioned the Unocal pipeline and whether or not its almost completed, cuz we arent leaving until that job is done. Why do you think Mullen keeps saying, “we are not leaving Afganistan”? The fight is with the Pentagon and these generals. I think the majority of both dems and repukes would end the war in Afganistan if another vote was taken. Where is Carper?
Meanwhile, 27 other senators signed a letter calling for a sizable and sustained withdrawal from Afghanistan. Coons is notably absent from the signatories (and Carper of course).
So Coons is trying to set up some kind of nuance between himself and that letter. The letter is substantially similar but perhaps goes a little farther than Coons is willing to go in setting up timelines:
Isn’t this an old Carper trick, carving out a separate position a little to the right but not obviously so?
Chris Coons is obviously following the lead of right wing neo con Carper. If he refuses to sign the letter, than his words are meaningless. Like the Conman Carney, he wouldnt join up with progressives and support the Progressive Budget. All these guys are in the hip pocket of corporate america and AIPAC. Its as obvious as the nose on your face. My question is how did Chris Coons a Jr. Senator get to sit on the Foreign Relations Committee…from county executive to the nations Senate Foreign Relations committee? My God no wonder this country is going down the tubes..we have idiots in high places with no experience whatsover being lead by the Carpetbagger Clown.
What is Debbie Wasserman Shultz thinking? She just made a statement that “we democrats own this economy”! What? Is she tone deaf or brain dead. How is it that the repukes just gave Obama a $3trillion deficit, voted against any and all job creation programs, and WE democrats own the economy? Who made that fool the democratic leader? Not only is she not very bright or articulate, she doesnt have the cahones to stand up for what the dems have done. Why isnt she pushing for more stimulus money for job creation. The dems are going to cave, mark it down, they are going to once again go along with republican tax cuts for the wealthiest, and there will be nothing done for jobs. Oila…2012…a republican in the white house.
Stop this heresy immediately!
The Dear Leader has declared that Afghanistan is the “good war” .
You must not question the methods of The Won.