Month: December 2008

South Dakota Watch got started earlier on their New Year's Resolutions, so early in fact that Todd Epp has written ten of them, Ten New Years Resolutions The Rest Of…

The eternal question now has an answer.  Go on, read Prager’s stellar insight into why women, and women alone, hold the power of a happy marriage… and are subsequently at fault when the marriage fails.

Prager gives us 8 reasons – which he promptly discards as nonsense before instructing women to lie back and think of England.

Let’s review them, shall we…

1. If most women wait until they are in the mood before making love with their husband, many women will be waiting a month or more until they next have sex. When most women are young, and for some older women, spontaneously getting in the mood to have sex with the man they love can easily occur. But for most women, for myriad reasons — female nature, childhood trauma, not feeling sexy, being preoccupied with some problem, fatigue after a day with the children and/or other work, just not being interested — there is little comparable to a man’s “out of nowhere,” and seemingly constant, desire for sex.

Ladies, are you paying attention?  It’s our fault. Hell, it’s our nature!  What happened to the sex kitten he married?  God knows, he hasn’t changed his behavior towards sex.  

2. Why would a loving, wise woman allow mood to determine whether or not she will give her husband one of the most important expressions of love she can show him? What else in life, of such significance, do we allow to be governed by mood?

What if your husband woke up one day and announced that he was not in the mood to go to work? If this happened a few times a year, any wife would have sympathy for her hardworking husband. But what if this happened as often as many wives announce that they are not in the mood to have sex? Most women would gradually stop respecting and therefore eventually stop loving such a man.

What woman would love a man who was so governed by feelings and moods that he allowed them to determine whether he would do something as important as go to work? Why do we assume that it is terribly irresponsible for a man to refuse to go to work because he is not in the mood, but a woman can — indeed, ought to — refuse sex because she is not in the mood? Why?

Where to begin?  Should we start with woman must overcome their moods?  Because, we all know, that the reason a woman may not want to have sex has nothing to do with her partner’s behavior or mood.  Or, should we focus on Prager’s comparison of not going to work to not having sex.  And while certain acts can be called jobs, most women aren’t prostitutes.  At this point I’m beginning to understand why Prager felt the need to write this article – He’s not getting any, and after reading this tripe we all know why.

3. The baby boom generation elevated feelings to a status higher than codes of behavior. In determining how one ought to act, feelings, not some code higher than one’s feelings, became decisive: “No shoulds, no oughts.” In the case of sex, therefore, the only right time for a wife to have sex with her husband is when she feels like having it. She never “should” have it. But marriage and life are filled with “shoulds.”

It’s those damn Baby Boomer’s fault!  I don’t even know where to begin with the “should” vs “want” argument.  To me, sex is best when both partners want it, but, then again, I’m a woman so reason escapes me.

So another "victim" is going to write a book. What can a guy write about that was under oath and over 100 times said he didn't recall? What a joke.…

Right down 19th and Market street in Philly protesters in support of Palestine are marching down 19th Street!

I think we all know this guy was a shoe in:

I bring you Mike W.  I hate to pick on a handicapped kid, but in the age of equality it is open season on this freak.  There are litterally hundreds of comments from this tool/troll.  1463 to be exact, and that doesn’t include the ones that were blocked. That was just from July of 2008!

Mike W. was the first person we “banned”  after giving him a time out.  There some serious internal debate about what to do with Mike.  I even said we should just ignore him.  But the little fella didn’t know when to quit so, we had to quit Mike W.  Here are just a few of his most idiotic comments and believe me, there are tons.

Ladies and Gentlemen we now present you with “Murderboy’s” best:

The comment that I believe started it all….

Submitted on 2008/07/09 at 10:54am

Americans have inherent and inalienable rights. The right to keep & bear arms is one such right. Everyone should be able to excercise their 2nd Amendment rights unless the government has proven, through due process, that the rights of a certain individual should be restricted.

Submitted on 2008/07/09 at 11:33am
Dana- Go ahead and repeal the 2nd Amendment. (let’s hypothetically assume there are enough votes to do so.) You are apparently ignorant of the concept of Constitutional Rights.

Repealing the 2nd Amendment doesn’t make it go away anymore than repealing the rest of the Bill of Rights would allow the government to kick in my door and rob, beat, imprison and torture me with impunity. The 2nd Amendment is inherent and inalienable just like the rest of the Bill of Rights. Words on ink & parchment don’t “grant” me the right to keep & bear arms, they merely codify a pre-existing right. My rights, all of them, exist independent of the Constitution.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Oq91ovdtxg[/youtube]

watch and learn an opposing view against Israel…but listen to the reporter express an obvious bias with her questions to the Palestian on the phone.

Should the United States really be taking Israel's side during this Gaza situation?

Former U.S. National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski went on his daughter Mika's show this morning and smacked down her co-host, former Republican Congressman Joe Scarborough. This clip concerns Brzezinski's insight…