Monthly Archives: January 2010

MLK Day Commemoration Project at WaPo

The Washington Post is running a project now asking people to share what of Martin Luther King’s words move you the most. They are looking for you to record your response and to upload it to You Tube, where they’ll post up on their website selected entries. The You Tube site to upload to (with some additional information) is here.

There’s other interesting info at the Washington Post link — a multimedia program recalling DC the day ofter King was shot and an assessment of the current state of the civil rights organizations that were central to the struggle for Civil Rights and others. Bu the call for people to reflect on and share the impact of MLK’s words on their lives is a worthy effort on this rainy afternoon.

Santorum Considers Tossing His Hat In The Ring

Via CNN:

In an e-mail and letter to supporters of his Political Action Committee, America’s Foundation, Santorum writes, “After talking it over with my wife Karen and our kids – I am considering putting my name in for the 2012 presidential race.”

“I’m convinced that conservatives need a candidate who will not only stand up for our views, but who can articulate a conservative vision for our country’s future,” Santorum also writes. “And right now, I just don’t see anyone stepping up to the plate.”

“I have no great burning desire to be president, but I have a burning desire to have a different president of the United States,” said Santorum, who lost his re-election bid in 2006 after two terms in the Senate.

Oh please, please make it so, because I do have a great burning desire to watch this campaign.

Will The Real Mike Castle Please Stand Up?

Mike Castle is trying to have things both ways. He’s trying to reassure the rightwing the he’s their guy while trying to maintain his cred as a moderate Republican. Even the News Journal doesn’t really know what to think, running an article in Saturday’s paper with the headline: “Castle’s Moderate Reputation Questioned”. The subtitle of the article was “Often bucks GOP, but not on central votes.” Mike Castle only votes against the GOP when it doesn’t really matter. He’s voted against the stimulus (while taking credit for it at the same time), against equal pay for women, against abortion rights (Stupak), against health care reform and against financial reform. He’s the ultimate status-quo candidate.

Down With Tyranny is also watching this race and notes that Castle is so confident in his Republican base in Delaware that he’s refusing to be sucked into the craziness that other so-called moderate Republicans are.

Castle, who has not exactly endeared himself to the extremists in his own party– and is absolutely loathed by birthers, deathers, gun-nuts and teabaggers. He’s not likely to pass any meaningful purity test being demanded by the right-wing of his party and the Club For Growth is already complaining that he’s refusing to sign their latest crazy pledge to repeal healthcare reform. Although Club For Growth has bamboozled 11 Republican candidates in 5 contested primaries– including another self-proclaimed “moderate,” Mark Kirk– to take their rather extreme pledge, Castle hasn’t buckled yet.

Castle even used his time in the GOP’s weekly radio address to praise Obama’s Afghanistan plans.

“Particularly since the surge in Afghanistan began, we have seen progress toward helping establish a country that can govern itself, defend its borders, and be an important ally in fighting terrorism,” Castle said in the Republican weekly radio address.

A group of House and Senate Republicans traveled to Afghanistan, the site of protracted U.S. military involvement since 2001, to assess the progress of war efforts there.

Castle praised Obama for elements of his national security strategy, particularly heeding military commanders’ wishes, keeping on Robert Gates as secretary of Defense, and showing a degree of flexibility in decision-making.

I think it’s pretty clear. Castle is going to run as a moderate Republican. We just need to remind voters that when push comes to shove Castle votes with the party of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck.

Weekend Open Thread

It’s time for your open thread. Hopefully this will be enough to tide you through the weekend.

Satan writes a letter to Pat Robertson:

Dear Pat Robertson, I know that you know that all press is good press, so I appreciate the shout-out. And you make God look like a big mean bully who kicks people when they are down, so I’m all over that action. But when you say that Haiti has made a pact with me, it is totally humiliating. I may be evil incarnate, but I’m no welcher. The way you put it, making a deal with me leaves folks desperate and impoverished. Sure, in the afterlife, but when I strike bargains with people, they first get something here on earth — glamour, beauty, talent, wealth, fame, glory, a golden fiddle. Those Haitians have nothing, and I mean nothing. And that was before the earthquake. Haven’t you seen “Crossroads”? Or “Damn Yankees”? If I had a thing going with Haiti, there’d be lots of banks, skyscrapers, SUVs, exclusive night clubs, Botox — that kind of thing. An 80 percent poverty rate is so not my style. Nothing against it — I’m just saying: Not how I roll. You’re doing great work, Pat, and I don’t want to clip your wings — just, come on, you’re making me look bad. And not the good kind of bad. Keep blaming God. That’s working. But leave me out of it, please. Or we may need to renegotiate your own contract. Best, Satan
LILY COYLE, MINNEAPOLIS

In the Massachusetts Senate special election you can phonebank for Martha Coakley through the Organizing for America website.

The GOP continues to shrink its tent. Falwell’s Liberty University pulled out as a sponsor the CPAC conference because they dare allow gay people to attend:

The right wing has been outraged over the Conservative Political Action Conference’s (CPAC) decision to allow conservative gay rights group GOProud to be a co-sponsor of the event. GOProud says it “represents gay conservatives and their allies” and is “committed to a traditional conservative agenda.” While it has eschewed many “traditional” gay rights issues like hate crimes legislation, it has embraced marriage equality and the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.

CPAC has resisted the far right’s efforts to pressure it to drop GOProud as a co-sponsor of the popular conference, even though some groups have threatened to boycott the event. Last month, CPAC director Lisa De Pasquale told Hot Air that she was “satisfied” that GOProud “do not represent a ‘radical leftist agenda’ and thus “should not be rejected as a CPAC cosponsor. David Keene, the head of CPAC’s main organizing group, assured the far right that GOProud would not be allowed to have any speakers at the conference.

These concessions weren’t enough for Liberty University Law School. Last month, Liberty University Chancellor Jerry Falwell, Jr. and Liberty Law School Dean Mat Staver, joined by other conservative evangelical leaders, wrote a letter to Keene with their objections. Staver has now announced that since they never received a “formal response,” they are dropping their co-sponsorship.

I heart Cory Booker

From Newark, New Jersey mayor Cory Booker’s Twitter feed:

@kamori07 Again, sorry bout the wait. Its a busy night in the city – I wish u & your family the best & I hope u still get the laundry done
Stay there I am coming now myself. RT @kamori07 lets talk police response! I’m on NYE Ave and Hobson in an accident STILL waiting 4 police.

Now that’s one heck of a good mayor.

Rethugs Float Newark Developer as Carney Opponent

Bill Stritzinger, whose main claim to fame appears to be trying to build 280 houses on the Newark Country Club site, has been seen making the rounds in Leg Hall, escorted by Monsignor Greg Lavelle, as a prelude to a candidacy against John Carney for the U. S. House of Reps seat. It makes perfect sense for Lavelle. Pushing someone who would turn verdant green space into suburban clutter anywhere else but his own district is right up his alley.

Of course, Stritzinger doesn’t see it that way. He, of course, is merely expanding the City of Newark’s tax base. The gist of the project is that he would build a golf course/residential community just across the state line in Cecil County, MD., and would redevelop the Newark Country Club site for McMansions.

The proposed project, known pejoratively as Stritzingerville, has encountered problems and has raised some serious ethical questions. Nancy Willing wrote about this back in 2008, and it deserves reading now. Stritzinger makes clear in comments before the Cecil County Comprehensive Planning Oversight Committee that sewer requirements are ‘too burdensome and excessive… and lead to higher housing costs’. Right, why do septic when you can just dump waste into the river?

More on the pros and cons of the project from Newark City Councilman Ezra Temko’s website. The comments really flesh out the issues.

Anyway, this appears to be Stritzinger’s sole would-be accomplishment. Rethugs and others are invited to provide others.

If this indeed is the best that the Rethugs can offer, I say, “Bring it on.”

Nothing Delawareans like better than suburban sprawl and greedy developers.

January Cattle Call

The Calendar tells me that it is 2010. But the real important date is July 30, 2010. That is the filing deadline. And until then we really will not know officially who is running for what when. But let’s play our game anyway. The game is rampant and unsourced speculation.

US SENATE

RATING: TOSSUP

BEAU BIDEN
MIKE CASTLE
CHRISTINE O’DONNELL

With Beau Biden, this race is competitive. Without Beau Biden, we are looking at Senator Castle. Let’s look the recent polls, with recent being a relative term.

PPP……….11/30-12/2/09……571 LV…..Castle 45…….Biden 39……….Undecided 16
Susquehanna…..11/10-15/09……..500 LV………Biden 45………Castle 40…….Undecided 14
Research 2000…….10/12-14/09…….600 LV…….Castle 46……..Biden……..45……….Undecided 9
Rasmussen……..9/30/09……….500 LV……….Castle 47………Biden 42……….Undecided 11

More polling on this race is no doubt underway, definitely internally, but also by Research 2000. To prod Biden into this race or to discourage him, that will depend on the results. Biden is waiting to announce probably by Spring, to allow the investigation into and prosecution of that Bradley monster to be unaffected by political announcements.

With all that said, this race is in a holding pattern until then. We won’t know if the Teabaggers will accept Castle. We know religious nutjobs like David Anderson are supporting O’Donnell, but how widespread is that support? It will be a fun summer. In the meantime, Castle raised $1.1 million last quarter, and is sitting on $1.7 million cash on hand. That is a good start. But he better keep raising money. Biden can raise that in one moneybomb in one day.

CONGRESS

RATING: SOLID DEMOCRATIC

JOHN CARNEY
SCOTT SPENCER
FRED CULLIS
CHARLIE COPELAND
TOM KOVACH
ANTHONY WEDO

Speaking of Beau Biden waiting…..where are the supposed strong Republicans Burris says he knows are gearing up for this race? Copeland? Kovach? We know Lavelle has decided against the race, for now anyway. So we are left with a Pennsylvanian millionaire (Anthony Wedo) and Fred Cullis. Wedo would make the race more interesting, since he could self fund, but he and Cullis are just sacrificial lambs to Carney. Copeland has made no recent moves to indicate he is running, and indeed his assine comments on his own blog Resolute Determination makes it an opposition research goldmine. But he may be arrogant enough to think that is not a problem.

So John Carney is strongly favored to pick up this seat for the Democrats.

TREASURER

RATING: LEAN DEMOCRATIC

VELDA JONES POTTER
CHIP FLOWERS
COLIN BONINI

I almost rated this a tossup, because we just do not know how this race is going to play out. The attention in the state is on the AG office at the moment. Now, if the voters seek to voice their displeasure at Markell over the upcoming budget battle, this would be the race to do it. And if that happens, this race could be turned on its ear. But if things stay quiet, the budget battle not acrimonious, well, I think it stays in the Democratic column.

AUDITOR

RATING: SOLID REPUBLICAN

TOM WAGNER
RICHARD KORN
KEN MATLUSKY

A Republican incumbent in a Republican year? Yeah.

ATTORNEY GENERAL

RATING: LEAN REPUBLICAN

CARL DANBURG
CHRIS COONS
FERRIS WHARTON

Chris Coons has recently informed friends and contributors that he is not going to run for AG. The fix is in for Danberg? Ferris Wharton is running, and has to be the favorite.

Thanks, Tom Carper!

The pharmaceutical industry lobbying group PHARMA is threatening to pull its support for the health care reform legislation because of a change in the health care bill.

The drug industry is threatening to end its support for President Barack Obama’s health overhaul effort because of a rift with the administration over protecting brand-name biotech drugs from low-cost generic competitors.

In an e-mail obtained Friday by The Associated Press, the president of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America told the trade group’s board members that “we could not support the bill” if the industry is given less than 12 years of competitive protection for the expensive products.

Obama and House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman, D-Calif., are leading the drive to shorten that period, which proponents argue would be a boon to consumers.

So, what are they upset about?

Both the House and Senate bills would for the first time create rules by which so-called biologic drugs, which are made in living cells, would be subject to copycat competition, saving the health care system billions of dollars over 10 years.

The drugs, which include big sellers like the cancer drug Avastin and the arthritis drug Enbrel, can cost tens of thousands of dollars a year. Biologics are not governed by the Hatch-Waxman Act, which covers generic competition for more conventional drugs made from chemicals, like Prozac or Lipitor. After the patent on a biologic drug expires, competitors may produce similar products, but they are treated by the health care system as if they were entirely new drugs, not substitutes like generics.

To retain incentives for innovation, both the House and Senate bills would provide a brand-name biologic drug with 12 years of protection from competition, even if the drug’s patents expire before that.

Until now it looked like the matter was settled because the 12-year period got wide bipartisan support in both chambers. And with Congress having much more prominent issues to grapple with, there seemed little chance this issue would be reopened.

That has changed. Mr. Obama apparently met with Congressional leaders and specified a shorter exclusivity period as one of the changes he wanted in the legislation, according to James Greenwood, the president of the Biotechnology Industry Organization, the biotech trade group, which favors the 12-year period.

So, they’re upset that they don’t get special protected status like no other pharmaceuticals get for 12 years?

I sure am glad that Tom Carper stood up for protecting the deal with Big Pharma in the summer:

Carper fought to prevent Medicaid and Medicare from negotiating drug prices (one of the big disappointments of Medicare Part D) and also fought drug reimportation.

Ask Dr. Liberal: What’s Up With Obama?

Reprinted, unedited (except for spelling errors [Seriously, it’s spelled B-a-r-a-c-k. Where did you get your freakin’ doctorate anyway?])

Dear Dr. Liberal,

Am I right to be mad at Barack Obama for selling out to all the Democratic douchnozzles and Republicans fucktards in Congress?  He does seem to have squandered the victory that we delivered to him in November and some of my liberal friends have already jumped off the bus.

Signed,
Wondering in Wilmington

Dear Wondering,

Duh. Of course you should be angry.  Obama’s obsessive congressional ass kissing is making him suck as a Democratic President in direct proportion to how great he was as a Democratic candidate.  The country hired him to be Franklin Roosevelt and he is looking like Franklin Pierce.  If ever America needed a big dream it was in 1980 and the US Hockey team stepped the fuck up.  If there was ever another time inour history when America needed a big dream it was/is in the wake of the sideways assfuckery of the Bush administration.  But instead of a “miracle on ice” rebuilding of the robust and optimistic American brand here and abroad we have a policy tinkerer.

But I think you know that.  I think your question is really trying to figure out how mad you should be and when should you get off the bus.

To answer by way of extending your metaphor, how many friends outside of the bus throwing rocks at the bus and giving you the finger are too many?   How many announcements over the bus loudspeaker by Joe Lieberman explaining in his Elmer Fudd voice how Obama is wise to follow his counsel are too many Elmer Fudd announcements? How many crazed looks from John Boehner as he grabs the wheel and tries to steer the bus over a cliff are too many crazed looks?

Granted, last year’s stimulus package saved the economy from a complete meltdown – but you are on a bus with a bunch of crazy people headed to who knows where.  Unless Obama gets his partisan game on (really on…no seriously.  I mean so fucking on), you are going to be off the bus sooner or later anyway, so it all comes down to how far you feel like walking.

The 2010 62 District Strategy

The 62 District Strategy was a success in 2008, resulting in Democrats taking back the House and increasing their majority in the Senate. In 2004 in the Senate, we did not challenge Charlie Copeland or Liane Sorenson for their reelections. In 2006, we left Dori Connor coast to reelection without an opponent. In 2008, we ran candidates in all 10 Senate races and picked up 3 seats. Comparitively, in the House, in 2004, we left 11 Republicans unaccountable to the public (Lavelle (11), Spence (18), Roy (20), Miro (22), Oberle (24), Lofink (27), Wagner (31), Caulk (33), Buckworth (34), Ewing (35), and Lee (40). And then in 2006 we left 8 Republican seats unopposed (Maier (21), Miro again (22), Oberle again (24), Thornburg (29), Stone (32), Ewing again (35), Booth (37) and Lee again (40)). In 2008, we let 4 Republicans (Hudson (12), Manolakos (20), Outten (30) and Carey (36)) coast to victory, an definite improvement in recruiting over 2004 and 2006.

The premise is simple: never allow an office holder to be unopposed for reelection, for that is undemocratic and unDemocratic. The people should always be given a choice, and Democrats cannot make inroads into conservative areas without actually making an effort. As I said someone famous once sid, half of life is just showing up. And in politics, it is three-fourths. Thus, it is maddening whenever we fail as Democrats to contest a district seat.

But it is understandable why candidates are left unopposed: because sometimes finding candidates in districts in hard, especially when an incumbent is long established and has a substantial fundraising advantage, and especially when a certain district’s demographics favor conservatives or Republicans, for that simply means that aren’t many Democrats to chose from for a candidate.

And as we enter a difficult year for Democrats politically, there may be a tendency to conserve resources to protect vulnerabilities, thus in 2010 we could see us return to allowing 11 or more Republicans get off scott free. But to me that feels like we are turning the ball over at the 30 yard line on second down, and I am not talking about a fumble or an interception. I am talking about purposefully giving the ball to the opposing team because we don’t feel like playing offense this year. Makes me puke.

As we enter 2010, 11 Senate races are up, as well as the entire House. I am posting this now so we can begin recruiting, and so we can see which races could and will be competitive. The filing deadline is July 30, so we have time, but good campaigns take a lot of time.

THE SENATE

Democrats have a 15 to 6 majority. Republicans would have to net five seats to garner the 11 seats needed for a majority. Democrats are defending 8 of the 11 seats up for election this time around. The three Republicans running are Dori Connor, Joe Booth (who was elected in a special last year to replace the deceased Thurman Adams), and Cathy Cloutier. There is also a possible special election on the horizon if Colin Bonini actually runs and wins the State Treasurer race.

(1) HARRIS MCDOWELL III

Safe Democratic. McDowell’s only danger is if we Democrats ever decide to primary his ass. We had rumors early last year that Charles Potter was going to primary him. ‘Bulo and I prefer Tom Noyes aka Tommywonk. Either way, this is a Democratic seat.

(5) CATHY CLOUTIER

Tossup. This is one of ‘Bulo’s top targets in 2010. I will let him speak:

Cathy Cloutier has served for 12 years in the Delaware General Assembly, first filling out the remainder of her late husband Phil Cloutier’s 1997-98 House term, being reelected to the House in 1998, and then winning the Brandywine Hundred seat of retiring State Sen. Myrna Bair in 2000. Virtually nobody begrudged giving Cloutier the chance to succeed Phil, who was the kind of non-partisan citizen-legislator who can only be found in the Newark area (Liane Sorenson/Terry Schooley) anymore, and who died far too young. […]

[Twelve] years into her political career, Cathy Cloutier is still a deer in the headlights[, with zero legislative accomplishments to her name]. […]

The latest registration figures show the district with 12,133 D’s, 9414 R’s, and 6505 I’s. And, if anything, the I’s are trending more D than R in this district now, a distinct change from the way things were right after reapportionment. The numbers get more daunting for the R’s by the month, and the number of people who remember Phil Cloutier drop every month. By the 2010 election, the registration plurality of D’s over R’s should be well over 3000. The registration margin when Cloutier last ran in 2006 was roughly 1500.

By now, the Democratic tilt in Brandywine Hundred has been well-documented, with Bryon Short, Dennis E. Williams, and Mike Katz winning long-time Rethug strongholds. Unknown, underfunded, but energetic Pat Morrison almost unseated Cloutier in 2006. First-time candidate Morrison got 47.4% of the vote, and would have won if suddenly-chivalrous union leaders had not fallen for Cloutier’s Damsel in Distress act. Unfortunately, Pat will not be able to run in 2010. If she did, she would win.

Cloutier only won with 52% in 2006. Is Bryon Short ready to move up? [Update]: Bulo is bullish on this race, and says in the comments below that any credible Dem other than Short can win this race. I am not so sure, but we will see.

(7) PATTY BLEVINS

Safe Democratic. The new Majority Leader won with 73%.

(8) DAVID SOKOLA

Lean Democratic. I only say that because Sokola won with 57% in 2006, over now Representative Mike Ramone.

(9) KAREN PETERSON

Safe Democratic. The Progressive champion was unopposed in 2006.

(12) DORI CONNOR

Safe Republican. Connor was unopposed in 2006 and is in good with the unions. She ain’t goin anywhere unless State Rep. Valerie Longhurst runs.

(13) DAVID McBRIDE

Safe Democratic. Same with McBride. [Update]: As pointed out below in the comments, McBride is vulnerable to a credible primary challenge since rumor has it he no longer even lives in the district.

(14) BRUCE ENNIS

Lean Democratic. Ennis seems well suited for his district, but this will be his first race for reelection.

(15) NANCY COOK

Safe Democratic. Cook was unopposed last time.

(19) JOE BOOTH

Lean Republican. Booth won the special election to replace Thurman Adams last year with 63% of the vote. That is an impressive margin and probably a correct one for his district. I only consider this a “lean” race rather than a safe one because this will be Booth’s first run for reelection in a general election, so it may be more competitive. But not likely.

(20) GEORGE BUNTING

Safe Democratic. That is, if Bunting runs for reelection. He has had health issues recently that may make that a question. Republican County Councilman George Cole would make this race a tossup to “lean Republican” if Bunting retires.

In the Senate this year, I do not see any Senator running for reelection losing. The only competitive race I see is against Cathy Cloutier, and I think she will hold on because I do not see Bryon Short running. He is needed more in the House, as you will see below….

THE HOUSE

The Democrats have a 24-17 majority. The GOP would need to win 4 seats (3 if they get Atkins to rejoin their caucus and run as a Republican) to gain back the majority. However, the GOP’s hopes are so far hampered by three retirements of Carey, Oberle and Thornburg, two of which (Oberle and Thornburg) are in Democratic leaning districts where the incumbent Republican barely won in 2008.

(1) DENNIS P. WILLIAMS

Safe Democratic. Williams won with 91% in 2008.

(2) HAZEL PLANT

Safe Democratic. Reelected with 94% of the vote in 2008. [Update]: Bulo thinks retirement is a possibility here given her recent health issues. Either way though, it is a safe Dem seat.

(3) HELENE KEELEY

Safe Democratic. Keeley was unopposed in 2008.

(4) GERALD BRADY

Safe Democratic. Brady won with 73% of the vote against Tyler Nixon last time.

(5) MELANIE GEORGE MARSHALL

Safe Democratic. Marshall was unopposed last time.

(6) TOM KOVACH

Tossup. Kovach won the special election last December against Mike Migliore with 51%, or by 73 votes. This will be a very competitive race as the 6th District is a strong Democratic district, and Kovach only won because Democrats were unmotivated to vote. To show you how Democratic this district is, 46% of the voters are Democrats, while only 29% are Republicans. But Tom Kovach may be the type of Republican to hold it, as he has been voting moderate so far. And then there is also a possibility that Kovach runs for Congress, and if that is the case, this seat will go back to the Democrats.

(7) BRYON SHORT

Lean Democratic. Short won the seat in a special election in 2007. He won reelection with 59% of the vote. But until he gets another landslide under his belt in this swing district, I cannot consider it safe.

(8) QUINTON JOHNSON

Safe Democratic. Johnson won reelection with 57% [Update]: Bulo thinks this could be a vulnerable seat in an Republican year. I would have to know who the Republican is before I change my ranking.

(9) RICHARD CATHCART

Lean Republican. Cathcart keeps holding on, surviving two Democratic wave years with just over 50% of the vote. I am not taking the bait this time, but ‘Bulo thinks Cathcart remains vulnerable to candidate not named Rebecca Walker. [Update]: Geek says below in the comments that Ms. Walker is running again and is optimistic on her chances. We will see. I am of the mindset that if you couldn’t get it done in two Democratic wave elections you will not get it down in a favorable Republican year.

(10) DENNIS E. WILLIAMS

Tossup. The other Dennis Williams barely won with 50.4% over longtime Bob Valihura. Will Valihura seek a rematch to reclaim his seat?

(11) GREG LAVELLE

Lean Republican. Lavelle won reelection with 63% of the vote in 2008. He won with 58% in 2006. He is tightening his hold on the district. The only way this race because competitive is if Lavelle runs for Congress, which is a possibility. Read ‘Bulo’s analysis of our prospects against Lavelle here. He is more optimistic than I.

(12) DEBORAH HUDSON

Safe Republican. She has been unopposed three times in the last 10 years, all the way back to when she was a Capano. When she is challenged, she gets over 60% of the vote.

(13) JOHN MITCHELL

Safe Democratic. Mitchell was unopposed last year, just like his predecessor Van Sant was unopposed whenever he ran for reelection.

(14) PETER SCHWARTZKOPF

Safe Democratic. The Majority Leader was unopposed.

(15) VALERIE LONGHURST

Safe Democratic. Longhurst was unopposed in 2008.

(16) JAMES JOHNSON

Safe Democratic. Johnson was unopposed in 2008 too. Yeah, the GOP has their own problems with a 62 District Strategy. But I don’t care about that.

(17) MICHAEL MULROONEY

Safe Democratic. Mulrooney won reelection last time with 83%.

(18) MICHAEL BARBIERI

Tossup. Barbieri defeated Republican Speaker Terry Spence on his second attempt in 2008, so the GOP will want some revenge. Barbieri garnered 52% in 08, so this race will be competitive. [Update]: Bulo is more optimistic than I at the chances Barbieri can keep this seat. I guess it will have to depend on who the GOP runs.

(19) BOB GILLIGAN

Lean Democratic. Speaker Gilligan won with 78%, but you would think the GOP will be gunning for him like we went after Spence and Cathcart over the last four years.

(20) NICK MANOLAKOS

Safe Republican. Manolakos was not challenged by the Democratic Party last time, but instead by the Blue Enigma Party. That’s embarrassing. Needless to say Manolakos coasted to reelection.

(21) MICHAEL RAMONE

Tossup. Read ‘Bulo’s fine analysis here. If we find a credible candidate without the drama and indecision of the Creedon campaign in 2008, we can win this back, given the district’s demographics and history.

(22) JOSEPH MIRO

Safe Republican. Miro won reelection with 66% of the vote. [Update]: Paul in the comments says there is a candidate preparing to run (he didn’t mention a name) that will have more time and money this time than our own beloved Rebecca Young had in her race last time. I hope so.

(23) TERRY SCHOOLEY

Safe Democratic. Schooley won with 75% last time.

(24) BILL OBERLE, JR.

Leans Democratic. Yeah, ‘Bulo called it. Oberle represented this district for years as the last of the great Northeastern liberal Republicans. When was the last time you heard a Republican be pro-labor and pro-gay rights? He had to be, as his district tilts heavily Democratic, as voter registration rolls show there are 6,597 Democrats, 2,993 Republicans and 3,175 registered in other parties or no party at all. Now that Oberle is retiring, I have to favor the Democrat is this race at the outset. It is the Democratic Party’s strongest chance for a pickup this year. [Update]: Paul also says there is a Democratic candidate preparing HER run. I wonder who it is?

(25) JOHN KOWALKO

Safe Democratic. Progressive Champion and Delaware Liberal commenter John Kowalko won reelection with 73% of the vote in 2008.

(26) JOHN VIOLA

Safe Democratic. Viola won with 80% of the vote last time.

(27) EARL JAQUES

Tossup. Jaques lost to Lofink by 60 votes in 2006. In 2008, Jaques won by 46, if you combine Lofink’s two ballot positions (he was the candidate for both the Republican and Working Families Party). Lofink is not running again. I think Jaques will be able to retain the seat, especially now that Lofink is gone, but you still have to think this is a tossup given the close elections over the last four year.s

(28) BILL CARSON

Safe Democratic. Carson was unopposed last time.

(29) PAM THORNBURG

Tossup. Thornburg is retiring. She says it is because she is to be the Administrator of the Delaware Farm Bureau. I think it is because she barely won reelection with 50.2% of the vote, after a recount of absentee ballots gave her the victory. This district has a more even voter registration, with 7,192 registered as Democrats, 5,687 as Republicans and 4,302 as other. Republican Lincoln Willis has declared. Former Mayor of Wyoming Hans Riegle (R) is also running, setting up a “Resolute Determination” v. “Delaware Politics” primary. ’08 Democratic nominee Charles “Trey” Paradee and a number of other Democrats are considering the race as well. Read Bulo’s analysis here.

(30) WILLIAM OUTTEN

Safe Republican. Outten was unopposed in 08.

(31) DARRYL SCOTT

Lean Democratic. Scott forcibly retired double dipper Nancy Wagner in 2008, winning with 53% of the vote. Nancy Wagner is avoiding a rematch and is instead running for Dover Mayor. [Update]: Bulo thinks this should be a tossup in a favorable Republican year. Again, I will have to see who the GOP runs.

(32) BRAD BENNETT

Lean Democratic. With all our rookies, you have to say that their first race for reelection is a competitive one, especially if they represent a competitive or conservative district. According to the latest voter registration totals, there are 5,469 Democrats, 3,365 Republicans and 3,064 Others. Bennett won last time with 57%.

(33) ROBERT WALLS

Lean Democratic. Walls was first elected in 2006, and he was reelected with 54%, which would point to a competitive race this time around. [Update]: Bulo rates this a tossup, and it could be depending on who the GOP runs.

(34) DONALD BLAKEY

Safe Republican. Blakely won with 61% last time.

(35) DAVE WILSON

Lean Republican. I only say “lean” because this is Wilson’s first campaign for reelection. He was elected with 61%, so he should be safe.

(36) GEORGE CAREY

Lean Republican. Carey is retiring, but given the nature of this district in what will be a Republican year, you have to say this seat favors whatever Republican runs. The district lies along the Delaware Bay on the eastern side of Sussex County. It reaches from Milford to Route 9, and Route 113 serves as its western boundary. Voter rolls say there are 6,940 Democrats, 5,899 Republicans and 3,932 others. 36th District Committee Chairman Emory West says state archivist Russ McCabe (D) and former Sussex County Councilman Lynn Rogers (d) are considering running. The committee is meeting this month to discuss possible candidates.

I have not heard anything about a Republican running. Dave Burris decided against a run, shockingly enough. But still, given the demographics, history and nature of the 2010 election, you have to favor the Republican here. But we will see.

(37) RUTH BRIGGS KING

Tossup. King just won election last year in the special to replace Booth, who won election in his own right to replace Thurman Adams. She won with 53%. Just like Short up north, you have to consider a close race in a special to be a competitive one in the general, especially with even registration numbers (5,584 D, 5,295 R, 3,111 O). I haven’t heard if Robinson will seek a rematch.

(38) GERALD HOCKER

Safe Republican. I see sign on the way to my parent’s house that says Hocker for Governor. I wonder…. Needless to say, Hocker is safe (he won with 72%) until he runs for Governor, then he will be toast.

(39) DANIEL SHORT

Safe Republican. Short won with 69% last time.

(40) BIFF LEE

Lean Republican. After finally being challenged after 2 elections of running unopposed, Lee won with 59%. I don’t know about you, but that seems low to me. [Update]: And an anon commenter says Barb Hudson (D) is back for more this time.

(41) JOHN ATKINS

Safe Republican. I guarantee you Atkins is going back to the GOP, and he will win reelection.

So, I see a net gain of 2 seats (including the Atkins party switch) for the Republicans at this point, not enough to win back the majority, but enough to make it close at 22-19. Of the tossups, Democrats are defending Jaques (27th), Williams (10th) and Barbieri (18th), while Republicans are defending the open seats in the 24th and the 29th, as well as King (37th), Ramone (21st), and Kovach (6th). I think all three of the latter retain their seats, and Democrats will win the 24th and the Republicans will retain the 29th. Republicans will gain two seats in defeating Dennis E. Williams and Michael Barbieri, if I had to guess today. Jaques will win reelection in the 27th, this time by a more comfortable margin.

Friday Open Thread

TGIF! It’s a planet-wide edition of your open thread.

Jim Inhofe declares himself #1!

Inhofe suffered his latest indignity at the hands of Rolling Stone, which awarded him the 7th spot on its list of the “planet’s worst enemies.”

Inhofe took this as a slight. “I should have been number one,” he told KFAQ radio in Tulsa, “I guess [Warren] Buffet has a lot more money so he went first.”

Inhofe also aired his grievances in an interview with the Tulsa World. “My first response was I should have been number 1, not number 7,” he said. “I am serious about that. I have spent now literally years on this thing, and it has been a long, involved thing.”

Something to be proud of, I’m sure.

Nuclear annihilation of the earth is less imminent:

The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists announced today that it would push their Doomsday Clock back one minute — to six minutes to midnight — in recognition of President Obama’s efforts to combat nuclear proliferation and climate change. Scientists concerned the world was spiraling toward nuclear disaster first introduced the clock in 1947 and it has only been adjusted 18 times since. The group of scientists — which includes 19 Nobel laureates — hailed Obama’s “pragmatic” foreign policy:

A key to the new era of cooperation is a change in the U.S. government’s orientation toward international affairs brought about in part by the election of Obama. With a more pragmatic, problem-solving approach, not only has Obama initiated new arms reduction talks with Russia, he has started negotiations with Iran to close its nuclear enrichment program, and directed the U.S. government to lead a global effort to secure loose fissile material in four years.

Obama really is the anti-Bush when it comes to foreign relations.

Bulo’s Music for the Masses: R. I. P. Bobby Charles

Far too many of these lately. But I do these tributes so that people remember, or perhaps learn for the first time, about the special musical legacies these artists have left behind.

Bobby Charles, actually Robert Charles Guidry, was a Cajun who was first inspired by Fats Domino and who helped to create that wonderful musical gumbo known as ‘swamp pop”. A reluctant performer, he was a first-class songwriter who wrote some classics and some songs that deserve to be classics. Here are a select few:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fEiiLZdA3Sg[/youtube]

“See You Later, Alligator” -Bill Haley & the Comets

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdHG8wnkUuQ[/youtube]

“Walking to New Orleans” -Fats Domino

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIAmcJHu1Z0&feature=related[/youtube]

“I Don’t Know Why I Love You, But I Do” – Clarence ‘Frogman’ Henry

“Tennessee Blues” -J. D. Crowe & the New South (featuring Keith Whitley)

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6s2R511jHKs&feature=related[/youtube]

” No Use Knockin'” -Bobby Charles