DL Open Thread: Friday, January 19, 2024

Filed in Featured, Open Thread by on January 19, 2024

Rethugs Bully, D’s Cower.  The story of one progressive judge and his predictable fate:

This country has no more devoted a public servant than Judge Todd Edelman of the D.C. Superior Court. While other law graduates joined white-shoe firms,Edelman, a friend of mine since college, spent years as a public defender, as a labor union lawyer and, for the last 14 years, on the D.C. bench, where he is now presiding judge of the civil division.

Yet few have been so abused by the Senate’s broken judicial confirmation process as Edelman.

President Barack Obama nominated him in 2016 to fill a vacancy on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. But this was during then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s blockade of Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland, and Edelman, caught up like other nominees in the Republicans’ refusal to move Obama’s judicial picks, never got a vote, or even a hearing.

President Biden nominated Edelman to the same court in 2022. Republicans struck again, this time with an ugly, Willie-Horton style smear campaign. Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) fabricated an outrageous lie, telling the Senate Judiciary Committee that a man Edelman released in a pretrial hearing “went on to murder — to murder — an 11-year-old.” In reality, the man in question hadn’t murdered anyone, but Blackburn badly distorted the facts of a case to suggest that Edelman was to blame for a child’s death.

This time, Democrats controlled the Senate. They could have, and should have, called out Blackburn’s nonsense and confirmed Edelman. Instead, they cowered. They shied from defending Edelman, or even pointing out the facts; during the 15-month ordeal, not one Democratic senator said one public word in support. The months dragged on, and Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) refused to schedule a vote before the Senate recessed for Christmas break. Two weeks ago, the White House pulled the plug rather than resubmit the nomination for the new session of Congress.

Edelman was an important pick for progressives. Only 6 percent of federal judges have been labor-union lawyers or otherwise came from the “economic justice” sphere, the progressive Alliance for Justice has found. The number of judges who were public defenders is not much higher. Edelman, in addition to his years defending those who couldn’t afford lawyers, served the Service Employees International Union, the United Food and Commercial Workers, the United Mine Workers, the United Steelworkers, the International Association of Firefighters and the AFL-CIO.

“Everybody knows the war is over, everybody knows the good guys lost.”  Hey, at least we can look forward to Sen. LBR equating opposition to Netanyahu with anti-semitism.  Which reminds me:

Netanyahu Tells Biden To Fuck Himself:

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says he has told the United States that he opposes the establishment of a Palestinian state once the conflict in Gaza comes to an end.

In a news conference, a defiant Mr Netanyahu vowed to press on with the offensive in Gaza “until complete victory”: the destruction of Hamas and return of the remaining Israeli hostages, adding that it could take “many more months”.

With almost 25,000 Palestinians killed in Gaza, according to the Hamas-run health ministry, and 85% of the Strip’s population displaced, Israel is under intense pressure to rein in its offensive and engage in meaningful talks over a sustainable end to the war.

Feckless Joe’s response: “Please, sir, can I have some more?”

Supreme Court Will Overturn Regulatory Protections.  Not even a question as to the outcome.  This is what the Koch Brothers and Citizens United dark money has sought.  No turning back:

“This court seems to have a clear agenda to weaken or perhaps entirely dismantle the administrative state and make it as difficult as possible for agencies to do their work,” said Clare Pastore, professor of the practice of law at the USC Gould School of Law. “Many people, even those who don’t tend to reflexively defer to agencies, have concerns about the Supreme Court eliminating Chevron and either taking control itself of critical regulatory decisions or stopping agencies in their tracks by sending everything back to Congress.”

“The court seems to be prepared to embrace a longtime goal of conservative scholars and activists, and replace Chevron not with the former framework, but with either an unprecedented judicial power grab (rejecting vast numbers of rules) or an impossibly high standard for Congress (requiring Congress to anticipate and address every possible ambiguity),” she said. “Either way, the court would control the administrative state and be able to stop, delay or eliminate any rule it disfavored, no matter how sensible the rule or how consistent with Congress’ intent.”

An absence of regulatory guardrails could benefit banks and other such businesses. For agencies such as the EPA, FDA and Department of Health and Human Services, which have regulations intended to protect public health and the environment, a lack of oversight can be problematic, however.

Max Aung of the Keck School of Medicine of USC, whose work has revealed the health hazards posed by PFAS or “forever chemicals,” said that removing protections for the sake of free enterprise is an unacceptable trade-off.

“We need to keep our scaffolding of public health regulations strong to actively protect environmental health, prevent outbreaks, safeguard marginalized and vulnerable populations, and maintain society’s overall health and safety standards,” said Aung, an assistant professor in the Division of Environmental Health at the Keck School of Medicine. Aung recently spoke about the risks of forever chemicals at a news conference where California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced the state is enforcing new requirements for companies to disclose forever chemicals.

This is why the Koch Bros and the dark money groups paid to elevate Federalists to the bench. Ain’t gonna be any compromise on this one.

Another Crooked Cop.  Gee, I wonder how quickly LEOBOR will surface as a defense?:

A Delaware Division of Alcohol and Tobacco Enforcement officer has been charged with trading cigarette cartons for drugs and money, the state Department of Justice said.

Cpl. Joseph Dominic, 33, faces five felony counts and one misdemeanor charge following a joint investigation by the state Division of Alcohol and Tobacco Enforcement and Delaware State Police.

Dominic, who was hired by DATE on Sept. 5, 2016, had been division’s agent of the year in 2022 when he was a corporal and in 2018 when he was a patrolman, according to the agency’s website. A statement by the Delaware Department of Justice said Dominic is suspended from the force.

DATE enforces Delaware’s state liquor and youth access to tobacco laws.

“Nobody is above the law or beneath justice,” Delaware Attorney General Kathy Jennings said in a statement. “Misconduct by public officials is not just wrong by virtue of the crime itself — it also erodes public trust and dishonors the good work of the overwhelming majority of law-abiding public servants.

Well, yes, police officers are generally above the law and beneath justice.  Because of LEOBOR.  Even Kathy knows it.  Perhaps they’ll make an example of this guy just to promote the fiction that police are being held accountable.  Beats passing legislation requiring police officers to be held accountable.

What do you want to talk about?

About the Author ()

Comments (16)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. puck says:

    Nobody wants a two-state solution except for nostalgic old-timers in the State Department. Still, it is a diplomatic mistake for Netanyahu to publicly reject a Palestinan state.

    He has painted himself into that corner because he can’t afford to lose the far-right kooks in his coalition. Not to mention, any Israeli or Palestinian statesman who pursues a land-for-peace deal will likely be assassinated by his own extremists.

    But Netanyahu is not wrong to assert that any Palestinan state would become a platform to attack Israel.

    So instead, Israel (and the US) should challenge the regional powers to present their own acceptable security guarantees as part of mutual recognition of statehood. It seems like Blinken is working along those lines now.

    • paul says:

      Only geriatrics want a two state solution? Well, count this geriatric among those still wanting that. What are you proposing, other than an extension of the last 55 years of despicable violence? You live in “free” country and you don’t understand the yearning for freedom. Israel, like everyone else, should learn to live with it’s neighbors.

  2. Arthur says:

    The Diaa is looking to pass a NIL for high school students. I understand colleges doing it as they make millions off certain sports but high schools which mostly lose money from carrying sports?

    • paul says:

      some folks don’t know what NIL stands for…

      • It stands for Name, Image, Likeness. It’s a way for colleges to basically ‘buy’ athletes, mostly football and basketball, and enable them to cash in. In exchange for use of their name, image and likeness to promote the school or, more likely, the business interests of the wealthy alumni who pour money into a slush fund for the school.

        Makes me wonder–is the DIAA comprised solely of Sallies’ grads?

        • Anon2 says:

          Removing the aged alumni of Delaware’s catholic boys’ schools from the Delaware political leadership would go a long way towards progress and modernism. As much fun as it is for them to treat the state like their personal high school, there’s a million people now and most of them don’t give a fuck about schools which were created to keep black people out.

          • mediawatch says:

            Not sure which schools you’re referring to, and I’m not a defender of Catholic education, but take note that Salesianum admitted Black students before Brown vs. Board of Education forced Delaware’s public schools to begin to desegregate.

        • paul says:

          like

    • Alby says:

      An outrage. We should be getting educational institutions out of the minor-league sports business, not encouraging it at the high school level.

      Indeed, public high schools should not allow students to play football at all. Tax dollars spent damaging the brains we’re supposed to be educating.

      • On its face, this proposal, or is it a trial balloon, makes no sense.

        The argument at the big-time college level is that players who are making so much money for their institutions deserve some sort of compensation. I agree, especially since, for many, the ‘education’ rises to the lowest level needed to keep the players eligible.

        There is no such argument to be made at the high school level.

        • Alby says:

          Actually it was prompted by a court case involving the use of college players’ images in a video game.

          The whole practice needs to end. Let the fucking sports leagues set up their own minor leagues, end the pretense that these are students.

          And please spare me the “sports are good for people” crap. Of course they are. But there’s no need to have intercollegiate contests to get that benefit.

          People want to bash their brains out, fine. Not on my dime. And especially not in high school. I’m paying to improve their brains, not degrade them.

  3. Joe Connor says:

    There were black kids at St E’s and Sallies in the early 60’s when I was there. Several of the Religious were active in the civil rights movement. Parochial schools were founded largely because Catholics were not welcome in public education in the early 20th Century.

  4. nathan arizona says:

    puck – What would be your argument against a two-state solution? Or do you just mean that nobody from the Israeli government or Hamas (and some codgers at State) wants that? Do you think their reasoning should stop any attempt by anybody to find a two-state solution? What do you think would work better, at least theoretically? I realize that whatever it is wouldn’t be easy. Just curious.

    • puck says:

      I’m not opposed to a two-state solution. It would have to include mutual recognition, and mutual security guarantees among regional powers.

      “Mutual security guarantees” are the sticking point. Once the Muslim states realize the treaty would require them to protect Israel, and punish terrorist attacks on Israel coming from signatory states (including themselves), they would lose all interest in a Palestinian state. A never-attainable Palestinan state is a good sharp stick to poke the West with.

      Recognition by Saudi would be a good starting point though.

  5. nathan arizona says:

    puck – thanks for the explanation