Author Archives: liberalgeek

Socialism at the Gates

I gotta tell ya, I’m kind of sick of the empty cry of socialism every time the government tries to do something. Rob Tornoe always get people in an uproar on his Facebook account (and it is fun to watch) but inevitably someone starts talking about socialism-this or socialism-that when Rob talks about some egregious act done by corporate America.

So let me ask you this… should Libertarians (and the Republicans that sympathize with them) mail their bills and letters with FedEx?  How about the companies that support this line of thought? Do they use the post office to deliver their invoices and marketing material.

And honestly, don’t try to suggest that you do all of your bill payment on DARPANet the Internet either.

The Responsibilities of the Democratic Electorate

Hardly a week goes by without someone at Delaware Liberal taking a well-deserved shot at an elected Democrat. This puts the lie to screams of partisanship at us.  But further, the Democratic party has tried to be the police of their own excesses. Over the past few cycles, the Democrats have been able to put real effort into primaries with serious discussions, debates and finally elections.  Recently, a New Castle County sheriff of 30 years and a Treasurer of 2 years were sent packing in September. In 2008, the anointed Gubernatorial candidate was derailed by a politician that successfully utilized voting blocs that hadn’t voted in Dem primaries before.

Sure, these battles opened wounds that haven’t healed in some (and are even festering in others), but Delaware is better off as a result of this process of self-cleansing.  It reinforces the feeling that Dems are the adults in the room here in Delaware.

The need to purge our party of people that don’t take their responsibilities to the people of Delaware is an unending job and it takes a concentrated effort.  We have to often choose our battles so that we can win a few rather than lose a bunch of them.  In 2012, we will again be in a target-rich environment.  It is coming close to the time that we have to start picking our battles.

Up this time will be Tom Carper, Paul Clark and Tony Deluca.  I doubt that we can get all three (especially since we don’t have any obvious opponents yet), but I wonder who you think we should target to clean our own house of the stench of incompetence?

Wednesday Morning Fun: CRI

I have been thinking that CRI, which stands for “Caesar Rodney Institute” is probably secretly an acronym for something else.  Let’s come up with other things that CRI might REALLY mean.  I’ll start:

  • Charlies Risky Investment
  • Caustic Republican Idioms
  • Complete Republican Idiocy

There are so many ways to go.  Let’s see if we can find a good one to use when we refer to them in the future.

Guest Post: Delaware’s Education Insight Project (Part 2: What Will It Look Like?)

The following is a guest post by Mike Oboryshko. Mike is a Red Clay parent and a friend of mine and of this blog.

In Part 1, I introduced the Education Insight Project, and went over the RFPs that define the beginning of design and implementation. In Part 2, we will get into some more detail.

What do the dashboards look like, and what does Texas have to do with any of this?
Now, I’d like to be able to give you a list of all the dashboards, and tell you what they look like and how they work. But that would be missing the point of the RFP. The Dashboard RFP specifies that the job of figuring out what dashboards to build, and how they work, will be done by the winning vendor (together with DOE).

There is some direction though. The Dashboard RFP specifies that the dashboards will be developed according to a reference design created by the Michael and Susan Dell Foundation (MSDF). Yes, that Michael Dell, the billionaire computer guy from Texas (why is Texas always in the middle of these things?). Dell has created a foundation devoted to education, among other things, and one of its undertakings was to help Texas develop a new technology platform for its education system. From the Dashboard RFP:

The dashboard and its database will be based on design documentation funded by the Michael and Susan Dell Foundation that can be found here:  http://www.texasstudentdatasystem.org/dcd and here: http://www.districtconnections.com. This documentation will be revised and extended based on Delaware’s dashboard analysis and design process.

So the winning vendor’s job (together with DOE) is to review the Texas implementation, conduct further analysis together with Delaware stakeholders, and then figure out how to use or modify the Texas design to suit Delaware. We can copy and modify the Texas dashboards, or build our own. The point is that once the Data Warehouse is in place (see Part 1), new dashboards can be created fairly easily, once we know which ones we want to build.

I personally am hopeful there will be some dashboards aimed at parents, and that parents will be given a seat at the table when they are being designed. The Governor has in fact blogged about a Parent Dashboard, and expects it to be implemented later in the project. I have been trying to find out the scope and level of detail of student information in a Parent Dashboard. Will the current Home Access Center will be replaced by a new dashboard, or if it will co-exist with the new dashboards? I could not find an example of a Parent Dashboard in the Texas implementation.

To find out more about the MSDF Texas implementation, check out:
http://www.texasstudentdatasystem.org/dcd
http://www.districtconnections.com (documentation)

These links (on http://www.texasstudentdatasystem.org/dcd) give the best idea of what the Texas implementation looks like from the teacher’s point of view. I expect the Teacher Insight Dashboard will look a lot like this:

Elementary school
Middle school
High school

What is the data-driven approach?
Honestly, I don’t know that much about it. Professional educators will be able to describe the data-driven approach far better than I can. Basically, it is a common-sense approach that will be recognizable to anyone familiar with some form of process management: If you want to improve something, first you have to measure it. And you have to be able to see the data in different views, and work with it over time.

Importantly though, a data driven approach is necessary to implement a meaningful accountability system. Without data, accountability is just politics. So if I were a teacher, I don’t think I would be anxious about the data driven approach at all. Teachers, learn the system thoroughly and use it to your advantage. It can help you more than it can hurt you.

Suddenly you will have access to the same numbers and reports that are being used to evaluate you, and you can review them every day if you want. Once you know what numbers are being watched, you can keep on top of those numbers faster than they can. As long as they are the right numbers to be watching, this is a win-win-win: good for the students and the school performance, and for your own evaluations. And now that you know there is an easy-to-access data warehouse, you can ask for any amount of custom reporting if you have to make a case and you need support. Ask for the data dictionary, and get a geek friend to help you. I suspect the teachers who don’t embrace the new system will be the ones always behind on their numbers.

How will the metrics be used?
One important use of metrics, arguably the most important, will be to track student performance to identify when a student needs intervention. The graphic below is from the Texas web site explaining how metrics are used to identify a student who needs help with math. The point is that once you can visualize all in one place how a student has been performing over time, you can recognize the need for intervention.

Tyson’s standardized math scores have declined “nearly to failing” over three years. Last year he got a D in Pre-Algebra, and this year he is failing Algebra I and has missed 6 of 30 math classes. In this example, the system is tracking multiple metrics over multiple years: Standardized scores, class attendance, course grades, and “benchmarks” (whatever they are).

So this is great, right? The technology has flagged Tyson as needing intervention. The only problem is, Tyson’s six year old sister could have told you last year Tyson needed help in math! Why did Tyson not receive intervention last year, after the first week he started bringing home D’s from Pre-Algebra?

Based on what I see here, it is because the metrics are tracking at the course-grade level, not at the daily assessment level. This is what designers of information systems call granularity. If the system metrics had been granular enough to track daily assignments and tests, failing assignments could be flagged at a much earlier time for more meaningful intervention, in time to raise Tyson’s grade in Pre-Algebra, and have a much better basis for success in Algebra 1. Waiting for course grades and standardized tests to come in is not fast enough to help in a meaningful way. Perhaps the “benchmarks” are tracking daily grades? If so, then the tracking needs to rely more on the current data.

Kids are growing up fast, and we can’t be waiting for last year’s data before we take action. Interventions need to be identified over weeks, not years, and then performed as micro-interventions that will be less costly and more likely to succeed.

Of course, tracking daily assignments is hard. It is harder to design and build such a system, and harder for the teachers to keep up with the necessary grading and data entry. But if we want to use this system for meaningful and timely interventions, we will have to do it.

More metrics
Another example of metrics used to identify intervention occurred to me. One student can be getting assignment grades of “100, 0, 100, 0, 100,” while another student in the same class gets scores of “60, 60, 60, 60, 60.” Both students fail the course with the same grade, but they require very different interventions.

Issuing a failing grade to a student is a very serious matter. If a student receives a failing grade, we need to know why. Not at interims, not after the marking period, not next year, but NOW. If you are only tracking at the course grade level, all failing students look the same. Waiting for that D to come in, and then figuring out how to intervene, is too late.

So here’s my idea: Every time a teacher issues a failing grade, he or she should be required to enter a reason along with the grade. Just a short list of canned reason codes will be fine. Did the student answer all the questions wrong? Did the student lose the paper, or forget to turn it in? Did the teacher refuse to accept completed work a day late? Is the teacher just in a bad mood on Thursdays? Or will some teachers back down on issuing the failure, once they realize it will have to be explained on the record? How can we help students who are failing if we don’t know why?

The data will show what the problem is, as long as our metrics are tracking at the class assignment level. Is the student doing badly with assignments on Mondays? Is the teacher giving an inordinate amount of zeroes?

Either way, for this metric to be meaningful it will have to be built into the online grading system. I suspect it is not. And the workshop for developing the metrics is happening in the very near future.

REL workshop
To develop the underlying metrics for the new system, Delaware will turn to the Regional Educational Laboratory (REL) Mid-Atlantic. REL is a research arm of the U.S. Department of Education, and this is exactly the sort of thing they exist for. From the RFP:

At the request of the Delaware Department of Education, the Regional Education Lab Mid-Atlantic is currently in the planning stages of conducting an expert roundtable on the development and implementation of student-level indicators and metrics for use through data dashboards. Invited experts will be nationally recognized authorities who are knowledgeable on both the research and implementation of data dashboard systems. The roundtable will be based on a series of discussions, intended to be engaging and interactive, focusing on what are good student-level indicators/metrics, what are they good indicators of (i.e., academic achievement, dropout, etc.), what indicators are most useful for various stakeholders (e.g., administrators, teachers, parents), and using visual presentations of data for ease of use and comprehension. The event will be held in Delaware for a predetermined list of DDOE and district personnel.

Dashboard RFP, Section 3.2.2

So this is where the performance metrics will be decided: whether we track students at the assignment level or the course-grade level, whether we track reasons for failing grades or not, what data is included in accountability measures. This is essential information that the geeks need to know to design the database and the applications. That is why the winning vendor is required to attend and integrate the workshop outcome into the design.

If you are feeling left out, don’t. I know well that one of the biggest causes of project failure is an endless requirements phase that requires consulting everyone in multiple rounds of revision and approval. And the political costs of screwing up the RTTT money would be very, very high, as would the loss to our students. In this RFP I can sense a team that knows what it wants and needs to move quickly.

On the other hand, it would be useful to at least allow meaningful written public input into the REL workshop or any suitable points in the process, and a way to report back on the outcome of that input. In the current process, I don’t see parents having a seat at the table.

In Part 3, I will discuss the upcoming training sessions on the new technology for teachers and administrators (sooner than you think), and how any of this may or may not benefit parents, students, or teachers.

Guest Post: Delaware’s Education Insight Project (Part 1: What Is It?)

The following is a guest post by Mike Oboryshko. Mike is a Red Clay parent and a friend of mine and of this blog.

Last Friday, a pair of RFPs were awarded to develop some major new technologies for Delaware schools, as part of Delaware’s Education Insight Project. This project was outlined in Delaware’s Race To The Top application, and with these RFPs, the design and implementation is under way.

The goal is to “transform Delaware’s schools from ‘data rich’ to ‘data driven’ and to implement a flagship Race to the Top program.” Like most new technologies, this new system will change the way educators, students, and parents do business, most likely for the better.

“This isn’t just another grant, but whole system reform”

Dr. Lillian Lowery, DOE Secretary of Education

I confess I was not paying sufficient attention during the RTTT process, but the RFPs now have my full attention. My intent with this post is to walk through the RFPs and other public information, to highlight some important details, and to give a picture of what is going on with this new initiative. This is essentially an unauthorized biography with no inside information, so please feel free to correct me if you have data.

For this post I am not so much interested in who is awarded the RFP, or how much it costs (although Sungard seems to have a leg up). What interests me is the level of detail provided by these RFPs, providing some unusual transparency into the planning for the next-generation technology. This new system will largely determine how we all interact with the schools of Delaware’s future: students, parents, teachers, and administrators.

The new tools will open new possibilities, but will also impose new constraints, depending on how they are designed. And the design is beginning right now.

In Part 2, I will explain what is known about the design of the “Dashboards,” which are the actual applications that teachers and administrators will be using. We’ll discuss the underlying educational metrics, and the workshop that will be used to define them. Plus, I will answer the question: What does Texas have to do with all of this?

In Part 3, I will discuss the upcoming training sessions on the new technology for teachers and administrators (sooner than you think), and how any of this may or may not benefit parents, students, or teachers.

Like most parents, my involvement in the schools began with an interest in a particular issue that affected my family. In my case, the issue was parent-teacher communication. I began investigating the Home Access Center, which I felt could be used to better advantage for communication and parent involvement. There wasn’t much information available about it, so I began figuratively peering in windows and pulling at loose threads to figure out what modern communication capabilities were already available in the schools, and what was preventing the schools from using them to their best advantage. But that is a post for another day. In the end, my investigation led me to the Education Insight Project.

So on to the RFPs. DOE has posted the RFPs here at the time of this writing, but they may scroll off in the future. Not to worry, I have saved copies and will post them if necessary.

The Data Warehouse RFP
Education Insight Project, Longitudinal Data Warehouse, RFP # 2011-10

A data warehouse is simply a database that gathers data from multiple sources and makes it easy and fast for developers to build new programs to access it. The Data Warehouse RFP is for the design of a data warehouse for all Delaware school and student data. Most of Delaware student data is already kept in a common database (Sungard eSchoolMaster). Other data sources are also used, and are defined in the RFP.

The new data warehouse will keep the current databases in place, but will synch all the data and unify it in a single place where it can be accessed more easily, and is optimized for faster performance. This will allow developers flexibility to build new tools very quickly as needed (most likely web-based). Tools that were not practical to build before will suddenly become easy.

None of this data warehouse will be visible to most users. The way you will know it is there is when you start to see new web-based applications (“dashboards”) for using this data, in ways you probably never knew were possible. Teachers and administrators will be able to slice and dice data about individual students, or groups of students, or even their own accountability measurements.

The data warehouse will pull in school profile data, and licensure and other employment-related data for teachers, so the dashboards will potentially unify teacher and student data to provide very useful and detailed views of accountability data.

The Dashboard RFP
Education Insight Project, Insight Dashboard Analysis & Design, RFP # 2011-12

Dashboards are like the apps for your smartphone. They will be web sites that allow teachers, administrators, (and hopefully parents and students) to view and manipulate data in the warehouse. The first dashboard will be aimed at teachers, and training will begin this summer with a small group of teachers and administrators:

Over time, additional applications will be brought under the portal…

The first priority for the Portal will be the Teacher’s Insight Dashboard. The Teacher’s
Insight dashboard will filter out the noise inherent in the large volume of data available
about students in the classroom, allowing them to focus on things of greatest importance.

Dashboard RFP, Section 2.2

The technology revolution is coming to Delaware. So if you are a teacher or principal who has been a little uncomfortable with using web-based tools, it seems pretty clear these new tools will quickly become the center of your information world. I’d suggest volunteering for the training and getting with the new system at the earliest opportunity.

The Dashboard RFP is a little bit disorienting, because it doesn’t lay out traditional deliverables well specified in advance. Instead, the state basically knows where it wants to go, but is seeking a technical partner to help with the requirements and design work, and very likely remain with the project through development and implementation. Once the design is complete, the state reserves the right to do some or all of the development work itself. All in all, it seems like a smart use of an external vendor to supplement DDOE in-house capabilities:

This RFP is for the analysis and design of dashboards only…. When dashboard design is complete, the State will decide either to issue an RFP for dashboard development or to complete the development using DDOE staff.

… the Vendor will engage Delaware stakeholders in a collaborative analysis process to identify Delaware requirements…

Dashboard RFP, Section 1.1

I’ll have more on dashboards in Part 2.

Rep Keith Ellison Breaks Down in King’s Witchhunt Hearings

Rep. Keith Ellison is the only Muslim member of Congress.  Today he spoke before Peter King’s hearings about radicalized Islam in America.  This is the conclusion of his remarks, he tells a moving story of a Muslim-American being posthumously demonized.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Cgh0P8Dr9k[/youtube]

I find it inconsistent that Muslims are oversensitive when leaders paint them and their religion with broad brush strokes, but somehow Christians are victimized when someone says “Happy Holidays” to them in December.

And lest you think that Peter King is just an anti-terrorism crusader, he has a not-so-spotless history in terrorism sympathizing. But remember, inconsistency is a feature, not a bug, in the modern Republican.

My Movie Pitch

I don’t know if you have seen the great documentary film, Super Size Me by Morgan Spurlock, but it is a perfect example of a genre of film and non-fiction where someone takes a simple concept to its extreme to examine the consequences. In the film, Spurlock decides to eat nothing but McDonald’s food for every meal for a month. He sets down a few ground rules (must eat everything on the menu at least once, must finish the meal, must say ‘yes’ if the cashier asks if he wants to supersize his order, etc.)

It’s all fun and games until Spurlock’s body starts freaking out and his doctors tell him that he is risking his life if he continues.  The drama is heightened along the way with vignettes about the fast food industry, their marketing and the degree to which their “food” approximates food. Overall, it should be required watching for anyone that eats.

My movie is going to rely on this tried and true formula, with a few exceptions and a local twist.

My movie, with a working title “So Long and Thanks for the Fish” will be based on this chart.  It is DNREC’s chart of recommended consumption limits for fish caught in Delaware waters. Go ahead and take a look at it. I’ll wait.

You see, Delaware’s history as a mecca for the chemical industry, over-fertilization and industrial farming have made our waters hazardous.  The way that many of these chemicals actually concentrate in the fish has made huge swaths of them inedible. The chart is truly shocking to the uninitiated. Seriously, go look at it.

The plan is to make a film that features 3 meals a day prepared from fish caught in Delaware waters, every day, for a month. During the film, we can examine the source for each of the chemicals and how that company was actually allowed to dump a certain amount of the toxin into the waterway or how much they were fined, or how much they dumped on land and how it got into the streams.  We could talk about how these companies have externalized the costs of doing business and how Delawareans are paying the price in increased healthcare bills and lost wages and quality of life.

And after each of these stories, we can feature another dish… Carp from Lum’s Pond one day, a striped bass from Bowers Beach the next.  Each could be served with a little subtitle stating what the chemicals that they are concerned with are in that particular fish and what the limits should be “PCBs – No consumption for women of childbearing age and children. All others, eat no more than two meals per year”

This brings me to where I diverge with Super Size me and even The Year of Living Biblically, I won’t be the guy eating the fish.  That would be too easy (and frankly, dangerous). Instead, I would recruit one of the dimwitted “Corporations First” contingent from Sussex County to prove to me that self-regulation and business at all costs is really the best policy.

I’m hoping to also highlight local chefs to prepare all of the fish (including the aptly nicknamed Free Radical).  Presumably they could prepare the fish in a way that would minimize the taste of mercury and chlorinated pesticides so as to not scare off our intrepid designated eater.

If we throw in a few sections with the sucker visiting his doctor along the way and maybe some interviews with people that don’t realize the danger in feeding these fish to their kids for years.

Personally, I think I could win an Oscar.

Liberal Things To Do

If you have an open evening on Saturday, you may consider heading over to Theatre N for a screening of Inside Job at 8:30, followed by a Q&A session about the current state of Financial Regulation. One of the people that will participate in the discussion is Greg Wilson, Communications Director with the Delaware Community Reinvestment Action Council. Greg is a great resource for all things FinReg. If you can’t make Saturday night, there are other showings throughout the weekend, but the discussion after the Saturday showing promises to be interesting and enlightening.  Here is a speech by the director of the film, Charles Ferguson, PhD. at MIT about his film.

Also, if you missed the rally yesterday in Wilmington in support of Wisconsin unions, you’re in luck. There is a second rally on Saturday at noon on The Green in front of the Statehouse in Dover. The Rally to Save the American Dream is being organized by a variety of Unions and liberal PACs. There are plans for carpooling from Sussex county being organized by Joanne Cabry. I don’t know if Joanne wants her number published here, but if she wants to, she can put it in the comments section.

Have a liberal weekend.

State of the Treasurer’s Office

Just over a month ago, Chip Flowers was sworn in at the Treasurer of the State of Delaware. Since that time, he has started fulfilling campaign promises. He has a way to go, but hey, it’s been a month.

One of his suggestions was a regular report of Delaware’s economic situation.  The idea was to make the Treasurer’s office a watchdog of local economic indices to provide guidance to officials and the public.  On February 3rd, the first edition of this report was issued. Personally, I’d rather the report be issued in HTML than in PDF format, but they don’t ask me.  But if you look at the link, the report (The Delaware Economic Index) is an excellent thumbnail sketch of where the state is economically and how we are progressing in our recovery.

This week, Flowers released a document called The Report on the Delaware State Treasury.  Again, the damn thing is a PDF, but I can hope that it gets better.  I do find it a bit irksome that the document refers to “the People” like some sort of bizarre cult.  Perhaps Chip is trying to get in good with the Tea Partiers (pssst.. Chip, you got no shot with those people).

Anyway, the document is a bit of a “good news, bad news” report detailing the baseline of the Treasurer’s office.  The good news is that the employees are good, the revenue is good, the AAA bond rating is good.  The bad news is that Chip wants a couple of big honkin’ flat screens to have CNBC running 24×7 to monitor the markets (currently, they just have a single analog TV with rabbit ears.  So in Dover, that means that you can only watch Springer and Maury Povich). Also, the 23 people that work for the Treasurer, while great people, are too few in number.  It’ll be interesting to see where that issue goes with the Legislature.

Oddly, there is a section called “Security” that has been redacted because of the sensitive nature of it.  The full report is being made available to the legislature.  But since it appears in the “bad news” section, I can only assume that it means that Charles Potter still has a key to the building.

Finally, the document ends with a list of stuff that Flowers wants to accomplish as Treasurer and the status of those bullet points.  I’ll be interested to see how these progress as his term rolls on.

Also, a little birdie has told me that there are some other things afoot with Chip.  Apparently, he has scheduled a meeting with the Public Integrity Commission in March to discuss how to properly ensure that he doesn’t violate any public trusts when talking to clients that work with his law firm.  I guess it’s good to get ahead of these things and try to draw bright lines that can’t be crossed.

Liveblog the State of the Union Speech (Updated with Full Text of Speech)

Fill up your glass with your favorite adult beverage and join us for some hot and heavy liveblogging.

Update from Delaware Dem:

The full text of the speech. And don’t you conservatives or liberals complain about the length. If you can’t sit and listen for an hour you are child, not an adult.

Tonight I want to begin by congratulating the men and women of the 112th Congress, as well as your new Speaker, John Boehner. And as we mark this occasion, we are also mindful of the empty chair in this Chamber, and pray for the health of our colleague – and our friend – Gabby Giffords.

It’s no secret that those of us here tonight have had our differences over the last two years. The debates have been contentious; we have fought fiercely for our beliefs. And that’s a good thing. That’s what a robust democracy demands. That’s what helps set us apart as a nation.

But there’s a reason the tragedy in Tucson gave us pause. Amid all the noise and passions and rancor of our public debate, Tucson reminded us that no matter who we are or where we come from, each of us is a part of something greater – something more consequential than party or political preference.

We are part of the American family. We believe that in a country where every race and faith and point of view can be found, we are still bound together as one people; that we share common hopes and a common creed; that the dreams of a little girl in Tucson are not so different than those of our own children, and that they all deserve the chance to be fulfilled.

That, too, is what sets us apart as a nation.

Now, by itself, this simple recognition won’t usher in a new era of cooperation. What comes of this moment is up to us. What comes of this moment will be determined not by whether we can sit together tonight, but whether we can work together tomorrow.

I believe we can. I believe we must. That’s what the people who sent us here expect of us. With their votes, they’ve determined that governing will now be a shared responsibility between parties. New laws will only pass with support from Democrats and Republicans. We will move forward together, or not at all – for the challenges we face are bigger than party, and bigger than politics.

At stake right now is not who wins the next election – after all, we just had an election. At stake is whether new jobs and industries take root in this country, or somewhere else. It’s whether the hard work and industry of our people is rewarded. It’s whether we sustain the leadership that has made America not just a place on a map, but a light to the world.

We are poised for progress. Two years after the worst recession most of us have ever known, the stock market has come roaring back. Corporate profits are up. The economy is growing again.

But we have never measured progress by these yardsticks alone. We measure progress by the success of our people. By the jobs they can find and the quality of life those jobs offer. By the prospects of a small business owner who dreams of turning a good idea into a thriving enterprise. By the opportunities for a better life that we pass on to our children.

That’s the project the American people want us to work on. Together.

We did that in December. Thanks to the tax cuts we passed, Americans’ paychecks are a little bigger today. Every business can write off the full cost of the new investments they make this year. These steps, taken by Democrats and Republicans, will grow the economy and add to the more than one million private sector jobs created last year.

But we have more work to do. The steps we’ve taken over the last two years may have broken the back of this recession – but to win the future, we’ll need to take on challenges that have been decades in the making.

Many people watching tonight can probably remember a time when finding a good job meant showing up at a nearby factory or a business downtown. You didn’t always need a degree, and your competition was pretty much limited to your neighbors. If you worked hard, chances are you’d have a job for life, with a decent paycheck, good benefits, and the occasional promotion. Maybe you’d even have the pride of seeing your kids work at the same company.

That world has changed. And for many, the change has been painful. I’ve seen it in the shuttered windows of once booming factories, and the vacant storefronts of once busy Main Streets. I’ve heard it in the frustrations of Americans who’ve seen their paychecks dwindle or their jobs disappear – proud men and women who feel like the rules have been changed in the middle of the game.

They’re right. The rules have changed. In a single generation, revolutions in technology have transformed the way we live, work and do business. Steel mills that once needed 1,000 workers can now do the same work with 100. Today, just about any company can set up shop, hire workers, and sell their products wherever there’s an internet connection.

Meanwhile, nations like China and India realized that with some changes of their own, they could compete in this new world. And so they started educating their children earlier and longer, with greater emphasis on math and science. They’re investing in research and new technologies. Just recently, China became home to the world’s largest private solar research facility, and the world’s fastest computer.

So yes, the world has changed. The competition for jobs is real. But this shouldn’t discourage us. It should challenge us. Remember – for all the hits we’ve taken these last few years, for all the naysayers predicting our decline, America still has the largest, most prosperous economy in the world. No workers are more productive than ours. No country has more successful companies, or grants more patents to inventors and entrepreneurs. We are home to the world’s best colleges and universities, where more students come to study than any other place on Earth.

What’s more, we are the first nation to be founded for the sake of an idea – the idea that each of us deserves the chance to shape our own destiny. That is why centuries of pioneers and immigrants have risked everything to come here. It’s why our students don’t just memorize equations, but answer questions like “What do you think of that idea? What would you change about the world? What do you want to be when you grow up?”

The future is ours to win. But to get there, we can’t just stand still. As Robert Kennedy told us, “The future is not a gift. It is an achievement.” Sustaining the American Dream has never been about standing pat. It has required each generation to sacrifice, and struggle, and meet the demands of a new age.

Now it’s our turn. We know what it takes to compete for the jobs and industries of our time. We need to out-innovate, out-educate, and out-build the rest of the world. We have to make America the best place on Earth to do business. We need to take responsibility for our deficit, and reform our government. That’s how our people will prosper. That’s how we’ll win the future. And tonight, I’d like to talk about how we get there.

The first step in winning the future is encouraging American innovation.

None of us can predict with certainty what the next big industry will be, or where the new jobs will come from. Thirty years ago, we couldn’t know that something called the Internet would lead to an economic revolution. What we can do – what America does better than anyone – is spark the creativity and imagination of our people. We are the nation that put cars in driveways and computers in offices; the nation of Edison and the Wright brothers; of Google and Facebook. In America, innovation doesn’t just change our lives. It’s how we make a living.

Our free enterprise system is what drives innovation. But because it’s not always profitable for companies to invest in basic research, throughout history our government has provided cutting-edge scientists and inventors with the support that they need. That’s what planted the seeds for the Internet. That’s what helped make possible things like computer chips and GPS.

Just think of all the good jobs – from manufacturing to retail – that have come from those breakthroughs.

Half a century ago, when the Soviets beat us into space with the launch of a satellite called Sputnik¸ we had no idea how we’d beat them to the moon. The science wasn’t there yet. NASA didn’t even exist. But after investing in better research and education, we didn’t just surpass the Soviets; we unleashed a wave of innovation that created new industries and millions of new jobs.

This is our generation’s Sputnik moment. Two years ago, I said that we needed to reach a level of research and development we haven’t seen since the height of the Space Race. In a few weeks, I will be sending a budget to Congress that helps us meet that goal. We’ll invest in biomedical research, information technology, and especially clean energy technology – an investment that will strengthen our security, protect our planet, and create countless new jobs for our people.

Already, we are seeing the promise of renewable energy. Robert and Gary Allen are brothers who run a small Michigan roofing company. After September 11th, they volunteered their best roofers to help repair the Pentagon. But half of their factory went unused, and the recession hit them hard.
Today, with the help of a government loan, that empty space is being used to manufacture solar shingles that are being sold all across the country. In Robert’s words, “We reinvented ourselves.”

That’s what Americans have done for over two hundred years: reinvented ourselves. And to spur on more success stories like the Allen Brothers, we’ve begun to reinvent our energy policy. We’re not just handing out money. We’re issuing a challenge. We’re telling America’s scientists and engineers that if they assemble teams of the best minds in their fields, and focus on the hardest problems in clean energy, we’ll fund the Apollo Projects of our time.

At the California Institute of Technology, they’re developing a way to turn sunlight and water into fuel for our cars. At Oak Ridge National Laboratory, they’re using supercomputers to get a lot more power out of our nuclear facilities. With more research and incentives, we can break our dependence on oil with biofuels, and become the first country to have 1 million electric vehicles on the road by 2015.

We need to get behind this innovation. And to help pay for it, I’m asking Congress to eliminate the billions in taxpayer dollars we currently give to oil companies. I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but they’re doing just fine on their own. So instead of subsidizing yesterday’s energy, let’s invest in tomorrow’s.

Now, clean energy breakthroughs will only translate into clean energy jobs if businesses know there will be a market for what they’re selling. So tonight, I challenge you to join me in setting a new goal: by 2035, 80% of America’s electricity will come from clean energy sources. Some folks want wind and solar. Others want nuclear, clean coal, and natural gas. To meet this goal, we will need them all – and I urge Democrats and Republicans to work together to make it happen.

Maintaining our leadership in research and technology is crucial to America’s success. But if we want to win the future – if we want innovation to produce jobs in America and not overseas – then we also have to win the race to educate our kids.

Think about it. Over the next ten years, nearly half of all new jobs will require education that goes beyond a high school degree. And yet, as many as a quarter of our students aren’t even finishing high school. The quality of our math and science education lags behind many other nations. America has fallen to 9th in the proportion of young people with a college degree. And so the question is whether all of us – as citizens, and as parents – are willing to do what’s necessary to give every child a chance to succeed.

That responsibility begins not in our classrooms, but in our homes and communities. It’s family that first instills the love of learning in a child. Only parents can make sure the TV is turned off and homework gets done. We need to teach our kids that it’s not just the winner of the Super Bowl who deserves to be celebrated, but the winner of the science fair; that success is not a function of fame or PR, but of hard work and discipline.

Our schools share this responsibility. When a child walks into a classroom, it should be a place of high expectations and high performance. But too many schools don’t meet this test. That’s why instead of just pouring money into a system that’s not working, we launched a competition called Race to the Top. To all fifty states, we said, “If you show us the most innovative plans to improve teacher quality and student achievement, we’ll show you the money.”

Race to the Top is the most meaningful reform of our public schools in a generation. For less than one percent of what we spend on education each year, it has led over 40 states to raise their standards for teaching and learning. These standards were developed, not by Washington, but by Republican and Democratic governors throughout the country. And Race to the Top should be the approach we follow this year as we replace No Child Left Behind with a law that is more flexible and focused on what’s best for our kids.

You see, we know what’s possible for our children when reform isn’t just a top-down mandate, but the work of local teachers and principals; school boards and communities.

Take a school like Bruce Randolph in Denver. Three years ago, it was rated one of the worst schools in Colorado; located on turf between two rival gangs. But last May, 97% of the seniors received their diploma. Most will be the first in their family to go to college. And after the first year of the school’s transformation, the principal who made it possible wiped away tears when a student said “Thank you, Mrs. Waters, for showing… that we are smart and we can make it.”

Let’s also remember that after parents, the biggest impact on a child’s success comes from the man or woman at the front of the classroom. In South Korea, teachers are known as “nation builders.” Here in America, it’s time we treated the people who educate our children with the same level of respect. We want to reward good teachers and stop making excuses for bad ones. And over the next ten years, with so many Baby Boomers retiring from our classrooms, we want to prepare 100,000 new teachers in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and math.

In fact, to every young person listening tonight who’s contemplating their career choice: If you want to make a difference in the life of our nation; if you want to make a difference in the life of a child – become a teacher. Your country needs you.

Of course, the education race doesn’t end with a high school diploma. To compete, higher education must be within reach of every American. That’s why we’ve ended the unwarranted taxpayer subsidies that went to banks, and used the savings to make college affordable for millions of students. And this year, I ask Congress to go further, and make permanent our tuition tax credit – worth $10,000 for four years of college.

Because people need to be able to train for new jobs and careers in today’s fast-changing economy, we are also revitalizing America’s community colleges. Last month, I saw the promise of these schools at Forsyth Tech in North Carolina. Many of the students there used to work in the surrounding factories that have since left town. One mother of two, a woman named Kathy Proctor, had worked in the furniture industry since she was 18 years old. And she told me she’s earning her degree in biotechnology now, at 55 years old, not just because the furniture jobs are gone, but because she wants to inspire her children to pursue their dreams too. As Kathy said, “I hope it tells them to never give up.”
If we take these steps – if we raise expectations for every child, and give them the best possible chance at an education, from the day they’re born until the last job they take – we will reach the goal I set two years ago: by the end of the decade, America will once again have the highest proportion of college graduates in the world.

One last point about education. Today, there are hundreds of thousands of students excelling in our schools who are not American citizens. Some are the children of undocumented workers, who had nothing to do with the actions of their parents. They grew up as Americans and pledge allegiance to our flag, and yet live every day with the threat of deportation. Others come here from abroad to study in our colleges and universities. But as soon as they obtain advanced degrees, we send them back home to compete against us. It makes no sense.

Now, I strongly believe that we should take on, once and for all, the issue of illegal immigration. I am prepared to work with Republicans and Democrats to protect our borders, enforce our laws and address the millions of undocumented workers who are now living in the shadows. I know that debate will be difficult and take time. But tonight, let’s agree to make that effort. And let’s stop expelling talented, responsible young people who can staff our research labs, start new businesses, and further enrich this nation.

The third step in winning the future is rebuilding America. To attract new businesses to our shores, we need the fastest, most reliable ways to move people, goods, and information – from high-speed rail to high-speed internet.

Our infrastructure used to be the best – but our lead has slipped. South Korean homes now have greater internet access than we do. Countries in Europe and Russia invest more in their roads and railways than we do. China is building faster trains and newer airports. Meanwhile, when our own engineers graded our nation’s infrastructure, they gave us a “D.”

We have to do better. America is the nation that built the transcontinental railroad, brought electricity to rural communities, and constructed the interstate highway system. The jobs created by these projects didn’t just come from laying down tracks or pavement. They came from businesses that opened near a town’s new train station or the new off-ramp.

Over the last two years, we have begun rebuilding for the 21st century, a project that has meant thousands of good jobs for the hard-hit construction industry. Tonight, I’m proposing that we redouble these efforts.

We will put more Americans to work repairing crumbling roads and bridges. We will make sure this is fully paid for, attract private investment, and pick projects based on what’s best for the economy, not politicians.

Within 25 years, our goal is to give 80% of Americans access to high-speed rail, which could allow you go places in half the time it takes to travel by car. For some trips, it will be faster than flying – without the pat-down. As we speak, routes in California and the Midwest are already underway.

Within the next five years, we will make it possible for business to deploy the next generation of high-speed wireless coverage to 98% of all Americans. This isn’t just about a faster internet and fewer dropped calls. It’s about connecting every part of America to the digital age. It’s about a rural community in Iowa or Alabama where farmers and small business owners will be able to sell their products all over the world. It’s about a firefighter who can download the design of a burning building onto a handheld device; a student who can take classes with a digital textbook; or a patient who can have face-to-face video chats with her doctor.

All these investments – in innovation, education, and infrastructure – will make America a better place to do business and create jobs. But to help our companies compete, we also have to knock down barriers that stand in the way of their success.

Over the years, a parade of lobbyists has rigged the tax code to benefit particular companies and industries. Those with accountants or lawyers to work the system can end up paying no taxes at all. But all the rest are hit with one of the highest corporate tax rates in the world. It makes no sense, and it has to change.

So tonight, I’m asking Democrats and Republicans to simplify the system. Get rid of the loopholes. Level the playing field. And use the savings to lower the corporate tax rate for the first time in 25 years – without adding to our deficit.

To help businesses sell more products abroad, we set a goal of doubling our exports by 2014 – because the more we export, the more jobs we create at home. Already, our exports are up. Recently, we signed agreements with India and China that will support more than 250,000 jobs in the United States. And last month, we finalized a trade agreement with South Korea that will support at least 70,000 American jobs. This agreement has unprecedented support from business and labor; Democrats and Republicans, and I ask this Congress to pass it as soon as possible.

Before I took office, I made it clear that we would enforce our trade agreements, and that I would only sign deals that keep faith with American workers, and promote American jobs. That’s what we did with Korea, and that’s what I intend to do as we pursue agreements with Panama and Colombia, and continue our Asia Pacific and global trade talks.

To reduce barriers to growth and investment, I’ve ordered a review of government regulations. When we find rules that put an unnecessary burden on businesses, we will fix them. But I will not hesitate to create or enforce commonsense safeguards to protect the American people. That’s what we’ve done in this country for more than a century. It’s why our food is safe to eat, our water is safe to drink, and our air is safe to breathe. It’s why we have speed limits and child labor laws. It’s why last year, we put in place consumer protections against hidden fees and penalties by credit card companies, and new rules to prevent another financial crisis. And it’s why we passed reform that finally prevents the health insurance industry from exploiting patients.

Now, I’ve heard rumors that a few of you have some concerns about the new health care law. So let me be the first to say that anything can be improved. If you have ideas about how to improve this law by making care better or more affordable, I am eager to work with you. We can start right now by correcting a flaw in the legislation that has placed an unnecessary bookkeeping burden on small businesses.

What I’m not willing to do is go back to the days when insurance companies could deny someone coverage because of a pre-existing condition. I’m not willing to tell James Howard, a brain cancer patient from Texas, that his treatment might not be covered. I’m not willing to tell Jim Houser, a small business owner from Oregon, that he has to go back to paying $5,000 more to cover his employees. As we speak, this law is making prescription drugs cheaper for seniors and giving uninsured students a chance to stay on their parents’ coverage. So instead of re-fighting the battles of the last two years, let’s fix what needs fixing and move forward.

Now, the final step – a critical step – in winning the future is to make sure we aren’t buried under a mountain of debt.

We are living with a legacy of deficit-spending that began almost a decade ago. And in the wake of the financial crisis, some of that was necessary to keep credit flowing, save jobs, and put money in people’s pockets.

But now that the worst of the recession is over, we have to confront the fact that our government spends more than it takes in. That is not sustainable. Every day, families sacrifice to live within their means. They deserve a government that does the same.

So tonight, I am proposing that starting this year, we freeze annual domestic spending for the next five years. This would reduce the deficit by more than $400 billion over the next decade, and will bring discretionary spending to the lowest share of our economy since Dwight Eisenhower was president.

This freeze will require painful cuts. Already, we have frozen the salaries of hardworking federal employees for the next two years. I’ve proposed cuts to things I care deeply about, like community action programs. The Secretary of Defense has also agreed to cut tens of billions of dollars in spending that he and his generals believe our military can do without.

I recognize that some in this Chamber have already proposed deeper cuts, and I’m willing to eliminate whatever we can honestly afford to do without. But let’s make sure that we’re not doing it on the backs of our most vulnerable citizens. And let’s make sure what we’re cutting is really excess weight. Cutting the deficit by gutting our investments in innovation and education is like lightening an overloaded airplane by removing its engine. It may feel like you’re flying high at first, but it won’t take long before you’ll feel the impact.

Now, most of the cuts and savings I’ve proposed only address annual domestic spending, which represents a little more than 12% of our budget. To make further progress, we have to stop pretending that cutting this kind of spending alone will be enough. It won’t.

The bipartisan Fiscal Commission I created last year made this crystal clear. I don’t agree with all their proposals, but they made important progress. And their conclusion is that the only way to tackle our deficit is to cut excessive spending wherever we find it – in domestic spending, defense spending, health care spending, and spending through tax breaks and loopholes.

This means further reducing health care costs, including programs like Medicare and Medicaid, which are the single biggest contributor to our long-term deficit. Health insurance reform will slow these rising costs, which is part of why nonpartisan economists have said that repealing the health care law would add a quarter of a trillion dollars to our deficit. Still, I’m willing to look at other ideas to bring down costs, including one that Republicans suggested last year: medical malpractice reform to rein in frivolous lawsuits.

To put us on solid ground, we should also find a bipartisan solution to strengthen Social Security for future generations. And we must do it without putting at risk current retirees, the most vulnerable, or people with disabilities; without slashing benefits for future generations; and without subjecting Americans’ guaranteed retirement income to the whims of the stock market.

And if we truly care about our deficit, we simply cannot afford a permanent extension of the tax cuts for the wealthiest 2% of Americans. Before we take money away from our schools, or scholarships away from our students, we should ask millionaires to give up their tax break.

It’s not a matter of punishing their success. It’s about promoting America’s success.

In fact, the best thing we could do on taxes for all Americans is to simplify the individual tax code. This will be a tough job, but members of both parties have expressed interest in doing this, and I am prepared to join them.

So now is the time to act. Now is the time for both sides and both houses of Congress – Democrats and Republicans – to forge a principled compromise that gets the job done. If we make the hard choices now to rein in our deficits, we can make the investments we need to win the future.

Let me take this one step further. We shouldn’t just give our people a government that’s more affordable. We should give them a government that’s more competent and efficient. We cannot win the future with a government of the past.

We live and do business in the information age, but the last major reorganization of the government happened in the age of black and white TV. There are twelve different agencies that deal with exports. There are at least five different entities that deal with housing policy. Then there’s my favorite example: the Interior Department is in charge of salmon while they’re in fresh water, but the Commerce Department handles them in when they’re in saltwater. And I hear it gets even more complicated once they’re smoked.

Now, we have made great strides over the last two years in using technology and getting rid of waste. Veterans can now download their electronic medical records with a click of the mouse. We’re selling acres of federal office space that hasn’t been used in years, and we will cut through red tape to get rid of more. But we need to think bigger. In the coming months, my administration will develop a proposal to merge, consolidate, and reorganize the federal government in a way that best serves the goal of a more competitive America. I will submit that proposal to Congress for a vote – and we will push to get it passed.

In the coming year, we will also work to rebuild people’s faith in the institution of government. Because you deserve to know exactly how and where your tax dollars are being spent, you will be able to go to a website and get that information for the very first time in history. Because you deserve to know when your elected officials are meeting with lobbyists, I ask Congress to do what the White House has already done: put that information online. And because the American people deserve to know that special interests aren’t larding up legislation with pet projects, both parties in Congress should know this: if a bill comes to my desk with earmarks inside, I will veto it.

A 21st century government that’s open and competent. A government that lives within its means. An economy that’s driven by new skills and ideas. Our success in this new and changing world will require reform, responsibility, and innovation. It will also require us to approach that world with a new level of engagement in our foreign affairs.

Just as jobs and businesses can now race across borders, so can new threats and new challenges. No single wall separates East and West; no one rival superpower is aligned against us.

And so we must defeat determined enemies wherever they are, and build coalitions that cut across lines of region and race and religion. America’s moral example must always shine for all who yearn for freedom, justice, and dignity. And because we have begun this work, tonight we can say that American leadership has been renewed and America’s standing has been restored.

Look to Iraq, where nearly 100,000 of our brave men and women have left with their heads held high; where American combat patrols have ended; violence has come down; and a new government has been formed. This year, our civilians will forge a lasting partnership with the Iraqi people, while we finish the job of bringing our troops out of Iraq. America’s commitment has been kept; the Iraq War is coming to an end.

Of course, as we speak, al Qaeda and their affiliates continue to plan attacks against us. Thanks to our intelligence and law enforcement professionals, we are disrupting plots and securing our cities and skies. And as extremists try to inspire acts of violence within our borders, we are responding with the strength of our communities, with respect for the rule of law, and with the conviction that American Muslims are a part of our American family.

We have also taken the fight to al Qaeda and their allies abroad. In Afghanistan, our troops have taken Taliban strongholds and trained Afghan Security Forces. Our purpose is clear – by preventing the Taliban from reestablishing a stranglehold over the Afghan people, we will deny al Qaeda the safe-haven that served as a launching pad for 9/11.

Thanks to our heroic troops and civilians, fewer Afghans are under the control of the insurgency. There will be tough fighting ahead, and the Afghan government will need to deliver better governance. But we are strengthening the capacity of the Afghan people and building an enduring partnership with them. This year, we will work with nearly 50 countries to begin a transition to an Afghan lead. And this July, we will begin to bring our troops home.

In Pakistan, al Qaeda’s leadership is under more pressure than at any point since 2001. Their leaders and operatives are being removed from the battlefield. Their safe-havens are shrinking. And we have sent a message from the Afghan border to the Arabian Peninsula to all parts of the globe: we will not relent, we will not waver, and we will defeat you.

American leadership can also be seen in the effort to secure the worst weapons of war. Because Republicans and Democrats approved the New START Treaty, far fewer nuclear weapons and launchers will be deployed. Because we rallied the world, nuclear materials are being locked down on every continent so they never fall into the hands of terrorists.

Because of a diplomatic effort to insist that Iran meet its obligations, the Iranian government now faces tougher and tighter sanctions than ever before. And on the Korean peninsula, we stand with our ally South Korea, and insist that North Korea keeps its commitment to abandon nuclear weapons.

This is just a part of how we are shaping a world that favors peace and prosperity. With our European allies, we revitalized NATO, and increased our cooperation on everything from counter-terrorism to missile defense. We have reset our relationship with Russia, strengthened Asian alliances, and built new partnerships with nations like India. This March, I will travel to Brazil, Chile, and El Salvador to forge new alliances for progress in the Americas. Around the globe, we are standing with those who take responsibility – helping farmers grow more food; supporting doctors who care for the sick; and combating the corruption that can rot a society and rob people of opportunity.

Recent events have shown us that what sets us apart must not just be our power – it must be the purpose behind it. In South Sudan – with our assistance – the people were finally able to vote for independence after years of war. Thousands lined up before dawn. People danced in the streets. One man who lost four of his brothers at war summed up the scene around him: “This was a battlefield for most of my life. Now we want to be free.”

We saw that same desire to be free in Tunisia, where the will of the people proved more powerful than the writ of a dictator. And tonight, let us be clear: the United States of America stands with the people of Tunisia, and supports the democratic aspirations of all people.

We must never forget that the things we’ve struggled for, and fought for, live in the hearts of people everywhere. And we must always remember that the Americans who have borne the greatest burden in this struggle are the men and women who serve our country.

Tonight, let us speak with one voice in reaffirming that our nation is united in support of our troops and their families. Let us serve them as well as they have served us – by giving them the equipment they need; by providing them with the care and benefits they have earned; and by enlisting our veterans in the great task of building our own nation.

Our troops come from every corner of this country – they are black, white, Latino, Asian and Native American. They are Christian and Hindu, Jewish and Muslim. And, yes, we know that some of them are gay. Starting this year, no American will be forbidden from serving the country they love because of who they love. And with that change, I call on all of our college campuses to open their doors to our military recruiters and the ROTC. It is time to leave behind the divisive battles of the past. It is time to move forward as one nation.

We should have no illusions about the work ahead of us. Reforming our schools; changing the way we use energy; reducing our deficit – none of this is easy. All of it will take time. And it will be harder because we will argue about everything. The cost. The details. The letter of every law.

Of course, some countries don’t have this problem. If the central government wants a railroad, they get a railroad – no matter how many homes are bulldozed. If they don’t want a bad story in the newspaper, it doesn’t get written.

And yet, as contentious and frustrating and messy as our democracy can sometimes be, I know there isn’t a person here who would trade places with any other nation on Earth.

We may have differences in policy, but we all believe in the rights enshrined in our Constitution. We may have different opinions, but we believe in the same promise that says this is a place where you can make it if you try. We may have different backgrounds, but we believe in the same dream that says this is a country where anything’s possible. No matter who you are. No matter where you come from.

That dream is why I can stand here before you tonight. That dream is why a working class kid from Scranton can stand behind me. That dream is why someone who began by sweeping the floors of his father’s Cincinnati bar can preside as Speaker of the House in the greatest nation on Earth.

That dream – that American Dream – is what drove the Allen Brothers to reinvent their roofing company for a new era. It’s what drove those students at Forsyth Tech to learn a new skill and work towards the future. And that dream is the story of a small business owner named Brandon Fisher.

Brandon started a company in Berlin, Pennsylvania that specializes in a new kind of drilling technology. One day last summer, he saw the news that halfway across the world, 33 men were trapped in a Chilean mine, and no one knew how to save them.

But Brandon thought his company could help. And so he designed a rescue that would come to be known as Plan B. His employees worked around the clock to manufacture the necessary drilling equipment. And Brandon left for Chile.

Along with others, he began drilling a 2,000 foot hole into the ground, working three or four days at a time with no sleep. Thirty-seven days later, Plan B succeeded, and the miners were rescued. But because he didn’t want all of the attention, Brandon wasn’t there when the miners emerged. He had already gone home, back to work on his next project.

Later, one of his employees said of the rescue, “We proved that Center Rock is a little company, but we do big things.”

We do big things.

From the earliest days of our founding, America has been the story of ordinary people who dare to dream. That’s how we win the future.

We are a nation that says, “I might not have a lot of money, but I have this great idea for a new company. I might not come from a family of college graduates, but I will be the first to get my degree. I might not know those people in trouble, but I think I can help them, and I need to try.

I’m not sure how we’ll reach that better place beyond the horizon, but I know we’ll get there. I know we will.”

We do big things.

The idea of America endures. Our destiny remains our choice. And tonight, more than two centuries later, it is because of our people that our future is hopeful, our journey goes forward, and the state of our union is strong.

Thank you, God Bless You, and may God Bless the United States of America.

Special Election Musings

Thursday is the special election to fill the New Castle County Council Presidency position that opened up as a result of Chris Coons’ victory in November.  Tim Sheldon (D) and Tom Kovach (R) are the candidates.  Their campaigns have picked up steam in the past week with accusations by Sheldon that Kovach hasn’t disclosed potential conflicts of interest.  Kovach has launched an ad campaign tying Sheldon to Paul Clark and the skullduggery of county council at-large.

Let me say that I know, and like, both of these guys.  I would be proud to have a beer with either of them and I think that they would both be great public servants.

Sheldon has the upper hand here, as a Democrat in a very Democratic part of the state.  He will probably be pretty weak below the canal where County Council is often viewed as the least responsive governmental body in the state.  That said, his labor ties will help him get out the vote tomorrow and could make the difference.

What interests me are the ramifications of a Kovach win or loss.  If Kovach wins, what does it say to the 9/12 crew or the other Tea Partiers?  Do they learn to STFU in New Castle County or do they claim that they got Kovach elected?

If Kovach loses, does this put him out of elective politics?  Does it cost Tom Ross his job and hand it over to the Protack’s of the party?  As a Democrat, which is a better outcome?

What are you looking for tomorrow?

Why This Tax Cut Deal Sucks

This was the hill to die on.

If you have any desire to cut the deficit, you don’t extend these cuts.

For months, Obama has fought off attacks from the right, saying that he has exploded the deficit.  Of course, part of this is due to the current economic conditions and much of it has been inherited.  I used to think that this was a sign of stupidity on the part of the teapartiers, but it is worse than that.  Their support of these tax cut extensions shows them to be disinterested in actually controlling of the deficit and debt.  Rather, they just want tax cuts, no matter the cost to their precious grandchildren.

If you want to promote business investment and job creation, you don’t extend these cuts.

There has been a lot of bullshit in the past few weeks about how we were killing jobs by taxing S-Corp “Job Creators”.  This tax cut extension will only further the hoarding of wealth by these individuals.  Let me explain:

If a business generated $2M in sales and paid out $1M in raw materials, employees, expenses, etc. it has made $1M in profit.  That profit is what the owner is taxed on. You will note that he has already paid his employees.  So if his taxes are lower on that million in profit, it makes sense for him to pay the taxes and put that money in the bank.  And for the next 2 years, that tax difference is around 2.5%/year (or about $25,000).  However, a higher tax rate on his profits, makes it marginally more advantageous to reinvest some of those profits in employees, raw materials, supplies, etc. to avoid the higher tax rate.

We can argue and have an adult discussion about whether it is morally right to tax the wealthy, but let’s not have a bullshit discussion that the taxes are job killing as some disingenuous business interests are trying to peddle.

For now, I am left in the unenjoyable position of hoping that Nancy Pelosi stands her ground and saves the country.  I think she’s up to it, but for how long can she hold out?

John Shadegg Shouldn’t Drink and Talk

I saw Rep. John Shadegg(R-AZ) on Morning Joe on Tuesday morning.  He made a complete fool of himself.

First, he says (and then doubles down), on his belief that unemployed people save their money, rather than spending it.  Then he can’t get the gumption to criticize Sarah Palin as he evades  a direct question over and over and over again.  Keep in mind as you watch this clip that John Shaddeg is leaving the Congress, never to return when the new Congress is sworn in.  He has nothing to lose by telling Sarah is unqualified to be President, yet he can’t bring himself to say it.

Pathetic.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy