DEL Congressional Delegation DOES NOTHING as Trump intensifies attacks on four Democratic congresswomen

Filed in National by on July 18, 2019

President Donald Trump stepped up his vilification of four Democratic lawmakers as un-American at a raucous rally on Wednesday, as Tom Carper, Chris Coons and Lisa Blunt Rochester continue to do nothing other than try to curry favour with racist Trump enablers in the GOP.

I will be watching Blunt Rochester’s twitter feed today expecting another tepid statement of “disappointment”

About the Author ()

Jason330 is a deep cover double agent working for the GOP. Don't tell anybody.

Comments (35)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Our ‘Woman Of Color’ in Washington voted against impeaching our racist President. BTW, she’s listed as Blunt Rochester in the roll call, not Rochester:

    http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2019/roll483.xml

    She’s not just a ‘Woman Of Color’. She’s a ‘Woman Of Color’ who enables a racist President.

    By her vote, she’s made clear that this open appeal to racists, and nobody but racists, is not enough to warrant removing him from office:

    https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-renews-attacks-congresswomen-let-them-leave_n_5d2fc2a0e4b0419fd327c775

  2. RE Vanella says:

    This whole ugly affair is ruining her time-wasting sinecure in the House. She’s trying to hide! She needs this to blow over until Carper retires. It’s not blowing over though, is it?

  3. RE Vanella says:

    LBR office visit today or tomorrow. Anyone want to join?

    • jason330 says:

      text me the details. I’m a longshot to make it, but longshots sometimes payoff.

    • Not DE Lib says:

      Hope you land in jail, no respect! These women AOC, etc are totally clueless and if they don’t like the United States of America, they should leave!

      • jason330 says:

        I could go line by line and word by word demolishing this dummy, but I’m just going to let this comment sit here as a classic example of Trump-style brain cancer.

      • Alby says:

        Remember when Obama was president and you hated him? Same thing here. You didn’t leave, you voted for someone you liked better. Same here.

        “Totally clueless.” Wow, what a devastating critique.

      • RE Vanella says:

        AOC & co. are Americans. I’m American. We’ll fucking stay right here.

        And I may get locked up but very likely not. I’m just better and stronger than you.

      • Delawarelefty says:

        Ah Nixon’s “love it or leave it” line, it worked so well for him. The real question is what will America do with their MAGAT traitors once the Donald is disposed. Do we send them to FEMA camps or force them to swim to Russia?

  4. jason330 says:

    BTW, so far nothing on Twitter. LBR kissing the ass Trump enabling GOPer, Reschenthaler still occupies the top spot.

  5. jason330 says:

    Her FB page is a typical brag about her amazing bipartisanship. I wonder what Republicans would have to do to break faith with Lisa? Cannibalism? No, she’d still find a way to work with her esteemed colleagues on the other side of the house.

  6. Dana says:

    I’ll admit it: I checked this fine site expecting to find an outraged article about the House of Representatives tabling Rep Al Green’s (D-TX) impeachment resolution.

    What did I find? Crickets. 🙂

    • Alby says:

      So you’re bored again, I take it.

      We’re pretty used to the idea that Democrats are too cowardly to go up against the deplorables. Why, I can’t really fathom. Because they’re going to start shooting if we do? I welcome that. We can then eliminate them once and for all.

      • Dana says:

        Well, Mrs Clinton used the “deplorables” line, and it didn’t seem to work out all that well for her. She said that she regretted using the line, but really, she regretted it because it cost her politically; she was telling the truth about how she felt about Mr Trump’s voters. Would I be wrong in guessing that you, too, were asking why she wasn’t fifty points ahead?

        Thing is, Mr Trump’s supporters didn’t start shooting; they started voting, and that’s why Mrs Clinton is a private citizen today. They voted in Pennsylvania, which hadn’t been carried by a Republican since 1988. They voted in Minnesota and Wisconsin and Michigan, which weren’t ever believed to be states Mr Trump could carry. (Yes, I know; he didn’t win in Minnesota, but it was a lot closer than anyone would have guessed.) They voted in North Carolina and Florida, where Mrs Clinton believed she would win.

        Still, I’m not sure that you’d want Republicans to start shooting; it seems that conservatives are more likely to be armed than liberals and, just as importantly, more used to going out into the woods and hunting or target shooting. One can never be certain, in advance, how a war will turn out, but the odds don’t favor the left in a shooting war.

        • Alby says:

          The odds favor the government in a shooting war, and the ones who start shooting are the ones revolting. Do you think they’ll win this time? I don’t, so we’ll find out.

          Deplorables are what they were, are and will continue to be. And I say that as someone who despises the Clintons, Bill more than Hillary but Hillary more than most other politicians. They know it, too, as I suspect you do as well. Christians are taught to love their enemies. None of them do.

          And if those weren’t Mr. Trump’s supporters shooting up mosques and synagogues (hint: many were) they certainly weren’t HIllary’s.

          • Dana says:

            Alby wrote:

            The odds favor the government in a shooting war, and the ones who start shooting are the ones revolting. Do you think they’ll win this time? I don’t, so we’ll find out.

            Perhaps you’ve forgotten who controls the government, until January 20, 2021, and quite possibly until January 20, 2025?

            Nor is it just President Trump. Twenty-seven states have Republican governors. Other than large cities, conservatives dominate vast swaths of the country.

            The left have concentrated themselves into the major urban areas, where not only are they easier targets, but where they are killing each other at prodigious rates.

            I’m interested: why do you despise Mr Clinton more than Mrs Clinton? Bill Clinton won largely because he has charisma by the boatload, while his wife has . . . less. A lot less. That’s why she is a private citizen today. Their policy preferences are pretty much the same.

            • Alby says:

              Because he’s a sleazeball on top of their conjoined cupidity. Don’t forget, he’s another Epstein pal.

              • Tom Kline says:

                Easy on Joe… He’s an old senile man. Let him enjoy his millions in peace.

            • Alby says:

              As for the shooting: It’s actually already begun out west, and it’s going to get worse before it gets better, and the government won’t be able to pretend it’s not happening anymore. I expect it to break out in the Pacific Northwest, and when it does I expect all but the South and the Mountain West to unify in opposition to it.

              There is no unifying position for the right, as slavery was in 1861. They will not revolt en masse, and no legitimate government claiming sovereignty will allow the kind of small-scale “revolt” like those we’ve seen with the Bundys et al.

              Finally, don’t be misled into thinking the people who make up the government would be loyal to Trump. They already ignore him most of the time without him even noticing, and most people in, for example, the FBI take their oath to the Constitution rather than the president quite seriously.

      • Dana says:

        No, not bored; I just figured that I’d find some red soy-burgers here. 🙂

        • RE Vanella says:

          Ah, the old soy gambit. You’re extremely creative and smart.

        • Alby says:

          That’s what happens when a hippie-puncher moves to an area with no hippies — they have to punch them long-distance.

          • Dana says:

            Punch? I am sparring with you, but I’m certain that if we met at a Dunkin’ Donuts and knew who each other were, I’d simply offer my hand to you to shake, not smack you. Heck, I’d even buy you a coffee and sesame bagel, dark toasted, with butter!

            Hippie puncher? I’m 66 years old; what age do you think I was the last time I got in a fist fight?

            • Alby says:

              It’s a metaphorical term.

              https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=hippie%20punching

              I was referring to the fact that you have to visit Delaware online because you moved to an area with fewer outspoken liberals. Just a little joke, and I’d pay for the coffee.

              • Dana says:

                Well, you’re right in one regard: there aren’t many liberal blogs in Kentucky. When I looked, most of them were pretty lame.

                DL can be kind of fun; the comments are lively, but it’s not so big that everything gets lost. I just have to make my visits rare so Jason doesn’t ban me again. 🙂

  7. Dennis E Williams says:

    Here is my twitter reply on LBR’s twitter ‘disappointed’ comment:

    Disappointed? How about angry? How about speaking up more? How about standing with your fellow legislators to condemn his words and do something about it? Your ‘disappointment’ is as weak as ‘thoughts and prayers’.

    So far no response. Should I be disappointed?

  8. Dennis E Williams says:

    Here is my twitter reply on @ChrisCoons twitter comment about being ‘proud to work with his Republican colleagues’ on a recent bill:

    Senator,
    How can you be proud to work with Republican colleagues who support a racist, bigoted, unqualified, criminal President. I get that you might have to work with them on some issues, but proud?

    So far no response. My disappointment grows.

    • jason330 says:

      Good stuff. Keep it up.

      They are sleepwalking. It’s always 1997 in Coonsville.

    • I would welcome ANY serious challenge to Coons and LBR. I would volunteer on behalf of the challengers.

      But I draw the line at Dennis E. Williams, whose pathological need to run for office EVERY SINGLE ELECTION CYCLE is surpassed only by his utter ineptitude as a candidate and his utter lack of a raison d’etre for any of his candidacies.

      It’s funny and not a little ironic that Williams would seek to come over here and dupe an audience that is already hip to his tricks.