Power vs. Authority

Power vs. Authority

I teach my organizational behavior students that, in their relationships, there is a difference between power and authority. Power is the ability to influence behavior, while authority is the right to influence behavior. Authority is derived from some level of mutual agreement within the relationship. In America we give police departments the authority to pull us over if we appear to be speeding. We grant that lifeguards on the beach, and cops on the highways enforcing the rules that we've established redounds to the general benefit of society. Social scientists call the extent to which we accept authority as legitimate as the "zone of indifference." When a cop, a lifeguard, or even our fast food managers go beyond what we perceive as their authority, we seem to know it intuitively. We all have a highly tuned sense of our personal zone of indifference. Unlike authority, power does not depend on a relationship. The lunchroom bully can influence behavior, but there is no consent given or implied when he takes the weaker kid's lunch money. Power is as power does. The bully has the ability to take the lunch money based on his strength, so he takes it. Now we have a class of citizens, police, who have abused their authority and have only power left. One cop murdering an unarmed kid and getting away with it doesn't simply diminish his own authority. That injustice drains authority out of the entire system. And once gone - authority does not come back. Once the mutual agreement that we've entered into in order to establish lines of civil authority has been broken, power is the tool remaining in the state's tool box. We call that a police state.
If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns, and those outlaws will be cops

If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns, and those outlaws will be cops

Statistically speaking, the biggest murders in Utah are cops.
There have been more deaths caused by police shootings than by gang members, drug dealers or from child abuse in the past five years in Utah, according to The Salt Lake Tribune. This year alone, the Tribune reported, police shootings have claimed more lives than violence between spouses or partners, for a total of 13 deaths. A toll, which includes 22-year-old Darrien Hunt who was fatally shot by police in September.
Saturday News Round Up – Keystone XL Holding Congress Hostage Week 2

Saturday News Round Up – Keystone XL Holding Congress Hostage Week 2

It was a very eventful week. The House is suing President Obamain order to look tough to the Heritage Foundation which is basically running the GOP now. The lawsuit is nominally over Obamacare, but really because the President has yet to honor the GOP's request that he quit being President. In a brazen show of not quitting, President Obama announced this week that due to the fact that the Keystone XL pipeline is jamming up everything in Congress, he is going to stop deporting so many browns. That made the Heritage Foundation (and by extension the GOP) even angrier than they already were, and made Tom Carper lament the fact that the Keystone XL Pipeline is the root cause of all gridlock in DC.
“Given Congress’ inability to act (on the Keystone XL Pipeline) it is understandable for the President to examine ways the Administration can legally address the current needs of our country and the realities of the estimated 11 million undocumented people living in the shadows.” Carper added that while he supports the President, his first choice is to have a permanent, (bipartisan passage of the Keystone XL pipeline, which will allow for) solution to the immigration system.
GOP Impeachment Fever Breaks Hours After Obama’s Clear Message on Immigration

GOP Impeachment Fever Breaks Hours After Obama’s Clear Message on Immigration

While some conservatives are still in the grip of impeachment fever (see below), for the most part Jeff Sessions of Alambama, a man nobody can call a RINO, appears to be speaking on behalf of the GOP in general when he categorically rules out impeachment as a remedy for conservative's hurt feelings over immigration.
“No, we are not going to impeach or have a move to impeach. The president has certain powers. We truly believe, and I think it's accurate to say he abused those powers,” Sessions said.
It is noteworthy that Sessions was speaking at the Heritage Foundation which has been at the forefront of pushing GOP politicos into unalterably insane positions on immigration. [An Aside: It is also worth noting that TOM CARPER was dead wrong. As you may recall, Carper supported the GOP's protest over the looming immigration executive order and wanted the announcement delayed. Basing his position on the delusional notion that a show of comity would be reciprocated by a grateful GOP, Carper continued to show he is bipartisan to the point of lunacy.]
It isn’t the border, it’s the sub-minimum wage seasonal jobs with no benefits

It isn’t the border, it’s the sub-minimum wage seasonal jobs with no benefits

I love how conservatives blame immigrants for America's immigration "problems" and rail against President Obama as he attempts to nudge the country toward taking advantage of the desperation of immigrants in a slightly more transparent way. Conservatives hysterically claim that our porous southern border is the problem. It isn't. The problem is the greedy farmer. The problem is the unethical food processing company that doesn't want to pay a living wage or be bound by even the most minimal standards of workplace safety. That's what they found out in Alabama when they really cracked down on the people who employ illegal immigrant labor.
Tom Carper just heaped praise on this Republican – You will totally believe what happened next

Tom Carper just heaped praise on this Republican – You will totally believe what happened next

Yesterday Tom Carper heaped praise on his GOP buddy Tom Coburm of Oklahoma. After praising Coburn, he handed over the gavel of an Ebola hearing to the nutbag:
“I don’t want to chair this hearing today. I want Tom Coburn to chair it,” Mr. Carper said from the dais on Wednesday. “So I’m going to pass tho gavel over to him and put him in charge, and I’m going to try to be a good wingman. All right, Thomas, it’s all yours.”
What did the grand gesture of bipartisanship get Carper? Well, LATER THE SAME DAY Coburn predicted "anarchy" and "violence" will be the result of any executive order on immigration.
Keystone XL the root of all DC dysfunction according to Carper

Keystone XL the root of all DC dysfunction according to Carper

In an attempt to justify his execrable vote in favor of the environmental catastrophe known as the Keystone XL pipeline, Tom Carper's office released a statement which blames the Keystone pipeline for Congressional gridlock. That's right. It is the Keystone Pipeline, and not the whack-ass GOP that is fucking up everything in DC, according to Carper.
UPDATED: “Coons still a no”

UPDATED: “Coons still a no”

This from Reuters:
Senate staffers pressured Democrats including Chris Coons of Delaware to reverse their opposition to the pipeline. But Coons had used a similar line to King's in saying Congress should not issue permits when he said last week he would vote no. "He's still a no," a Coons aide said Tuesday afternoon.
Carper Changes His Reason For Voting in Favor of Keystone in the 11th Hour

Carper Changes His Reason For Voting in Favor of Keystone in the 11th Hour

Because his prior pretext (that this show of bipartisanship will usher in a golden age of bipartisan peace and prosperity) was patently ludicrous and <a href="http://delawareliberal.net//2014/11/13/i-cant-let-it-go-somebody-talk-me-down/">every bit of it was a cynical lie,</a> Carper has updated his reason for voting in favor of the environment catastrophe known as the Keystone pipeline. Now he says he is voting for this flaming peice of toxic shit because Mary Landreiu begged him to. <blockquote> "Senator Landrieu has been cajoling, pleading with her colleagues—mostly Democrats—to provide an up or down vote on this," Carper said in a recent interview with Bloomberg Politics. "I think the time has come." </blockquote> That's some fucking bullshit. As late as yesterday, we was still trying to slide by on the cynical lie that Republicans would "reciprocate" and a golden age of bipartisan work on climate change would commence.
From the Department of Obvious Findings: More Guns = More Crime

From the Department of Obvious Findings: More Guns = More Crime

Contrary to gun-nut dogma, "right-to-carry" laws don't reduce crime. They increase it.
"The totality of the evidence based on educated judgments about the best statistical models suggests that right-to-carry laws are associated with substantially higher rates" of aggravated assault, robbery, rape and murder, Donohue said in an interview with the Stanford Report. The evidence suggests that right-to-carry laws are associated with an 8 percent increase in the incidence of aggravated assault, according to Donohue. He says this number is likely a floor, and that some statistical methods show an increase of 33 percent in aggravated assaults involving a firearm after the passage of right-to-carry laws.
Makes sense. Guns make the weak feel strong.